X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sendgrid.net;
	h=subject:to:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=smtpapi; bh=Ucym/oli0sEd/xt/WP/zQVlbBeQ=; b=hxjHUH/2+2mf+MXcni
	F4rat5wcwCG/A0/yjNQo0Nh5XuTsqdR0g4dvTYtn86Edm2ivPGlMMPBI89HYBQB0
	E6DT2xDm1L6WEvuD05mkeIstVaYcP3umdjXKMQK/xVQCjMpP/9Ci3LSYJDrddC2f
	Xame0mH0LKbuc6LTD96eAfhH4=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] QFN packages solder mask
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<2df480cc-5ef2-9ac6-b7ad-d17788a6b8b9 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<aec326a8-34dd-b47e-837a-b249748918b0 AT mcmahill DOT net>
From:	"John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<59149c35-79a3-2bd7-4b04-6d0967fcfe0a@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:58:56 -0600
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Icedove/45.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<aec326a8-34dd-b47e-837a-b249748918b0@mcmahill.net>
X-SG-EID:	V53lTA/kUP1+IqXnzXuv0M/cu/N8aMtf7nxyAyKnAkucvSjcNmNRUO82fNVFQEOsrgwS9t0O0oX6gM
	5L5eWuZXtIwZApQE0P1x8QkCXdL28K9xMp8UAQYLbg1KSk7vh5gosykR9JL8XdPmy9YhJnRmw2Jih5
	XtIqv5UrtpZuazIM2Q3kBWQea3bi6eZXD7PFa16xb/yHt5xDm2jMjzNpFe0FC2HEv4hx/5VIwFTv8C
	Y=
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 01/17/2017 10:00 PM, Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> I've been making footprints for QFN packages and came across guidelines
>> by the chip makers that say
>> it is beneficial to have some solder mask under the edge of the QFN
>> package, but not if it gets too thin
>> anywhere, as it can come off and cause trouble if it is.
>
> I don't have great suggestions about the soldermask bit.  Did you look at the QFN footprints in the ~geda library?  I thought we
> had a decent coverage of packages but it has been a while since I looked.

When you dig into the docs about what I saw at first, it seems like solder mask under the edge of the QFN
package could be a negative or a plus.  They suggest all the gaps between paste areas and metal areas to make channels
that volatile gas can escape from during reflowing.  So there are not bubbles left in the solder.

So, the basic shapes we have from footprint generators are OK really.

Vias in a center pad can be a minus if they pull out too much solder, but they are
a help against bubbles forming, and they're needed to connect any separate pads
for current flow.  The goal is often heat flow also, and vias help with that a lot.

Now I'm more confused than when I started reading about it.

- Raw text -