X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=fmuFn553qJY+NW2HSaQN0NqooRFz5hDsVOEhaCuSpgY=;
	b=aXbhPuUAtc2VR6jydarzaXNwhsW8iUEsUKNb/Tg4c7ZgzGpLkn5xaKd9QjxpyLLVd7
	suAWOCIiqMs7QUDrpjZ08IgaV66FljM5yFrnWBGla8aEWWs5HoTLCwYjCuAYWjlyXCLy
	Du3jMDkEMTpKBNQRI3n7ve//qPeOkf1GlX2r1/KSs134i3SZE1qe71TX9O4AiAmXJDJ+
	EIMrfxX3VzCPVSiCHounM+OmaQcwOhGbc5v+ZmMnZ+R6oRc+A7HUH9A2zKtiQxXy5vbR
	KdS/Jwl3FjZGPVOkifKF8zu9qEM69jxCLKOudcbPcfkpv1/La5oGuCvGno6LEept4Y5T
	D3wQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=fmuFn553qJY+NW2HSaQN0NqooRFz5hDsVOEhaCuSpgY=;
	b=QxtrVZk8zYkpmW31iI9tU9B3vSpnsK+U3kvzj6PCRFou4PeQfpodXA1WV75FLROu15
	KUQI+DZ+fmrQ8pT16JLSPbzmW7aHCmPHsjVx5rYUUWerl+e/95cLKR8icQLwqncu76sV
	I+EwHfi/AShzTg41U9JZgsPYa4pbMuGAQYpK9Rr63Uo6ylDi65YUjbXJEBUFdar9treX
	HxNjJsfWFJfTEPdmIpyzleqDGFxsc59qB6EpVxLth2GyJ2JAjljbKbAlNFLk6P6i3dTd
	HIWecF1AxCPUrGmUM2Ynn7jNld9t9CYAQN6T6LELJDq7vDsjW8sEneiqrytvs7UHzYry
	rysg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALyK8tKQtY8Wm6kcpnFR8xylwu7y5m1UGjhhN1OwZCNYeHrjher0kkhPa1pnMRHIjSP+nQ==
X-Received:	by 10.25.125.4 with SMTP id y4mr6995448lfc.75.1468516606934;
	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:16:44 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] can't run gschem, but can run gaf --version (Guile
	problems?)
Message-ID:	<20160714171644.GG4347@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<0e645e32-dda6-7762-a528-78c019331c4f AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAMvDHVCONtLwGpna+pvHiH+R9Xhg8x4ebD72nmuPFH1RtfCCZg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<6647c170-2564-b2f8-5ee8-94cce01b26ec AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20160714152917 DOT GA15540 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<18b0d745-7657-a81d-0807-f634651ea6fa AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1607141756100 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	<5ca33aba-b993-d578-13bc-a11365005bf7 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20160714163205 DOT GC4347 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<31b5b5a4-556c-906c-fa35-1102f65e4e69 AT ecosensory DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<31b5b5a4-556c-906c-fa35-1102f65e4e69@ecosensory.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:45:03AM -0500, John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 11:32 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >try just 'guile' in a terminal.
> 
> That's it.
> 
> guile
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>  157: 4 [catch #t #<catch-closure 2046c00> ...]
> 
> 
> I think debian is broken ins some odd way and it is time to compile guile
> and package it and not use all the 3 separate debian packages to do guile.

1) Verify your package installation [1].
2) You can update and reinstall any package you need. Usually I
use aptitude and 'L' (F10 + Package->Reinstall), but IIRC 'apt-get
install --reinstall package-name' does the same.
3) Update your system - use the latest stable Debian version
"Jessie".

BTW, I know several guile packages may coexist on your system. The
question is which of them is used to build other programs. I don't
know, what headers are used if you have, say, a guile-*-dev Debian
package and your own guile build of some version with headers
installed somewhere else. There should be, again, an order of
precedence where the compiler is looking for headers, and I
suspect, you'll have to somehow clearly tell it what header to use
in such a case.

[1] http://serverfault.com/questions/322518/can-dpkg-verify-files-from-an-installed-package

-- 
  Vladimir

- Raw text -