X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gschem: control over crossing conductors
	joining/jumping?
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<576804CC DOT 40703 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
	<20160620175415 DOT da8d008baad914f792d32839 AT gmail DOT com>
	<5768F5C1 DOT 2020607 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <nkfnmu$hos$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20160623063358 DOT 28f2bc8d03fab03ec15a53d9 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	"Matt Rhys-Roberts (matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Organization:	Envin Scientific Ltd.
Message-ID:	<5773C86F.2010309@envinsci.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:09:03 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20160623063358.28f2bc8d03fab03ec15a53d9@gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 23/06/16 05:33, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:14:21 +0200
> Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> wrote:
>
>> Matt Rhys-Roberts  wrote:
>>
>>> So I've given the pins more wire space, and now it's just wires
>>> crossing wires, not intersecting the ends of pins any more.
>>>
>> That's why I object against the recommendation of long pin for symbols
>> as given in the "official" geda manual.
>>
>> ---<)kaimartin(>---
> Long pins also use quite a lot of space.
>
Out of interest then, what's your difference between long and short in 
this case please?

- Raw text -