X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=sOlRwmwa3UoNCUwZ+IL/UZsFQYMUsD5xZ76cJ/zbwJQ=;
	b=qYj+ZRYzt6tvZuaWDuMgNzFgd1QvTm1ZtdncmxvNWPR+YDv73BnOZpISShMJxBy8nY
	d0DEspqEP9FQS9peOKFzpOF0VuOsjs1cs1g5OSYF0eVKMCQ7p9Ni0suyi4YhSeQPpZKE
	QxFyP/zXnnjJbSIESWmLbz/6cgI/Zoi3DEOkVTzdTJkSV1R4tJwAOgkuIAS4lJXtnJsl
	XqhXP+P2z4hWVkViBIu7NfFFtqPceKf62Ym5TIr1Pf7uopAQbkp6n6Km52yW9gE9BDTL
	gd5I+znbHrdMvLU2KYoVmxGpLPMufzaOwPXTDfF2DzQDdQa3ixD8znVM26Ek29L9M/Xx
	mf2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=sOlRwmwa3UoNCUwZ+IL/UZsFQYMUsD5xZ76cJ/zbwJQ=;
	b=WtOFun6JhKGu2t5XWBW7l1eRIjnALAhUDNQfAdwWOm3DPmvvWVHChNfHhPLlSDmM48
	CagKfsAqnOsJptGv4iJPvgc3TT3aUgsoT/e0lX5ArVko+55iZ9P+haXqAvFOxRQg3ks9
	zSgXQeM/2EKvpm9XSXs1JSwy5PMfmaWv/+uM+PtR0XYA4ntOUpe/25EhL88QhHrUAMCy
	qFPArLhrnsGjAeNBROkNcLwYOlmvoOdinRMxa34lvCDXGi8U2cBY1qhLw7mAuOxK7wpJ
	yeKGCwy0Em8V5G1FPwXrsHJypJZTKIIgRrsL7ToEJN7NEb0d0he4l7Dw23s/6J4ki1X/
	qhrg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOPr4FWUXATZ57/3+VPLyKW/KGqhqj5hDyXfuZark5gIjjbi7tkZiFNd8UuywpMid8y7ZYZtSQ++RVg5rBxkGQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.28.135.135 with SMTP id j129mr10352916wmd.101.1463607641691;
	Wed, 18 May 2016 14:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2016 13:40:41 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c-aXjQZLJnFuL0jqpaHEOzNZdXV2AjUqdfS10ea7ebN1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	[geda-user] response about DRC stuff
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com, Peter Clifton <petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

>> Do you think that between us we can work out a plan to hit improved DRC for
>> multiple netclass with different clearance rules? I will probably make some

How are you intending to do this?  It might be easiest to just re-run the entire
DRC with different settings, then throw out everything that doesn't involve
objects with different netclasses.  This is maybe a little hackish but DRC is
already sort of due for a rewrite anyway.  I guess this wouldn't help with
incremental if that's your preferred way.

However as John has pointed out in the past existing DRC is no good between
layers etc. so depending on what you want to do this might not be enough.
I think fixing DRC to be fully conscious of interlayer interactions
might be better
done with a rewrite than by trying to change the existing stuff.

Britton

- Raw text -