X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X_CMAE_Category:	, ,
X-CNFS-Analysis:	v=2.2 cv=Bvjf+sf5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=uZQz0Left1ab2btRV2iqXg==:117 a=uZQz0Left1ab2btRV2iqXg==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xtxXYLxNAAAA:8 a=Mj1Xp5F7AAAA:8 a=HFsQvnYFWlJGQPnE2nUA:9 a=UAn8T0343tmQZt6b:21 a=8_5QmR48Op_InEgS:21 a=xts0dhWdiJbonKbuqhAr:22 a=OCttjWrK5_uSHO_3Hkg-:22
X-CM-Score:	0
X-Scanned-by:	Cloudmark Authority Engine
X-Authed-Username:	TGFycnlAZ2x1ZWxvZ2l4LmNvbQ==
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyances
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20160505205109 DOT 2fa7b189f4210b3c0d7a8a4b AT gmail DOT com>
	<57320DDA DOT 4050107 AT gmail DOT com>
	<20160510191203 DOT d5dccf7d7353d0a550b97a1e AT gmail DOT com>
	<57322CA3 DOT 3010808 AT gmail DOT com>
	<915F1EED-B30B-43AF-ABB0-949F0A754918 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<7BAA31F3-9E00-4372-AB4A-7739D3FD2AA0 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q99ToQ0rB6CKCLqt3zSMtFWnxgxLppCW6c7hyeQ3cm2GA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E94B7DD6-F189-4781-8914-D0290BBEA1A5 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20160512165522 DOT GA1106 AT alpha2>
	<CAC4O8c9reDFThFxGURJSLZisgs0UOzXBwwOSqQFq86oK3qcwXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160512190533 DOT GA1161 AT alpha2> <5734E619 DOT 701 AT iee DOT org>
From:	Larry Martin <Larry AT GlueLogix DOT com>
Message-ID:	<9f0f65a0-5105-b2f6-2655-66d3036e0891@GlueLogix.com>
Date:	Sun, 15 May 2016 09:29:25 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5734E619.701@iee.org>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

 > sidestep the issue

On 5/12/2016 4:22 PM, M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
> On 12/05/16 20:05, Ivan Stankovic (pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>> sql-backed objects
>>> gets you rtree, undo and file format for free, and most of the nasty
>>> bits of current pcb are gone.
>> I prefer human-readable and human-writable formats, though I admit
>> sql solutions do have some advantages.
>>

> Whilst the human-readable files/formats have their merits, and the
> ability to 'hack' the saved files around with text tools is pretty
> wonderful, it does sidestep the issue of not being able to actually do
> the original tasks easily in-program and having to hack the saved files
> manually instead....

I have seen individual OrCad users spend hours clicking each component 
in a design to make a simple change.  I could have made the same change 
in a gEDA save file in a few seconds with a text editor.  Resources are 
always limited, and the GUI always falls short somewhere.  Even if the 
GUI does everything you want, the time to figure out how to do it may 
not be economical.  With human readable save files, you can always get 
the job done and move on.  I rely on my text editor in gEDA/PCB work for 
functions that _are_ supported in the GUI, but I can do them faster in 
emacs.  It's one of the reasons I like this toolchain.
/rant

- Raw text -