X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=CqT+LLbUxuX+B3nj5V/gL+kzY80+o4QGEl0LcmW7RbY=;
	b=ISVajLH+MpBAMgE3IN0bRU1cQi3FQPKILENrJgFnfKjX35p1JqwzADdiJ6L0vbGLxZ
	kLWfDNpnF0CYWklQIh015v+/1VQiKw2UVJ26rrUC3wwVmNb3grBedi9PP//MQI3O9tKa
	2Pvp2Fzt0eDE4ePBS1ogd8ZAhxLAUsyifqQ6uqsIijnAWetyXIbNK7jnuY//qZHbXiOr
	q681/DT7v50loF/ThlIFMjeR8mCNor+RW6SWydq6h5A/bZVHKxJd3qJJE8CWe+C2GYAI
	qTK3twF4Knsal+hpVU0kbv08lwSr0aRkIsuAtV5McnXMh/PrjXiNRjeOMSB4o9gRGIVD
	sLoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=CqT+LLbUxuX+B3nj5V/gL+kzY80+o4QGEl0LcmW7RbY=;
	b=FPUTyoSkG5aUgCMcKmto7GedK0zwBb6MiW7AlKAArF9HFsxA6hLCjXPYtQEF789o0l
	F+GITA0x3jB3qNWqIEvyCWdN0iZb987VvshNNYv2sVmW3I+xTyOHjsKft2N97AljSL56
	jLRCEdzDlkB0FbslmxVBl398IXqlBPOwSfWE+syBwwtr+ihWfVzKgG0FTu063vetrprK
	Rm6Q2d6PQLij+DcZpbPpNtDHhFu7vua2XxWmsfQXzd6Io5Ot+2HHwr2iu292vW4+zLVS
	W4o3zM0CYLcIz6rRiN5l+qEdetjgVUc5Zms7TNJ95mm8b30eeQPlaNbW2ZMEuzp+X0tB
	iExA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AD7BkJLc5E39fpv7QyjxhkRx8eZGtMUPHAL7Q11e/Htzj0hwOWel0u5/paZxymd4DiTuagsJ1spjAr53wdhq9w==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.28.107.80 with SMTP id g77mr17558713wmc.18.1457463609236;
	Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:00:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<20160308081507.GB19650@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<CAC4O8c8Lj0cNu4PDo8yqLnB0jVbLRF1GF9oVs2UFnttDt-BXZw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q-ru-2Dh=stkMq-UsOWJ592TOU-zV6kGtBgRdq2=BOXbQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_NCjEvxHQLe7A5Q97JsCdwR26TwqG+B0jT6cKGYBPN+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160308081507 DOT GB19650 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:00:09 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c-yuCu+67GB7vVgo-s1qFiYmz=Qc=FFSpfqP5jXyjG6YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] anyone know how to get rid of these warnings
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0900, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Peter Clifton
>> (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
>> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
>> > There are too many different compilers with different warnings, and they
>> > change over time with what code patterns may give rise to a warning.
>>
>> I'd still like to meet some of these non-gcc using pcb users.
>>
>
> Oh, even an apparently modest bump of GCC version can cause significant
> differences in warning behaviour. And many people are using clang now,
> although it currently has troubles with the kernel, clobbering the
> interrupt flag behind the kernel's back.

For gcc version bump warnings it's usually an improvement and you can just fix
the problem.  Not quite the same as non-gcc issues.  I'm fine with leaving
-Werror off provided people take the trouble to keep things warning-free
without it.  If not it would be better to have it on.

Britton

- Raw text -