X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:15:07 +0100
From:	"Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] anyone know how to get rid of these warnings
Message-ID:	<20160308081507.GB19650@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<CAC4O8c8Lj0cNu4PDo8yqLnB0jVbLRF1GF9oVs2UFnttDt-BXZw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q-ru-2Dh=stkMq-UsOWJ592TOU-zV6kGtBgRdq2=BOXbQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_NCjEvxHQLe7A5Q97JsCdwR26TwqG+B0jT6cKGYBPN+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c_NCjEvxHQLe7A5Q97JsCdwR26TwqG+B0jT6cKGYBPN+w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score:	-1.0 (-)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report:	Content analysis details: (-1.0 points)
	pts rule name description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
	-0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.0861]
	0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
	See
	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
	for more information.
	[URIs: googlemail.com]
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0900, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Peter Clifton
> (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

[snipped]

> > There are too many different compilers with different warnings, and they
> > change over time with what code patterns may give rise to a warning.
> 
> I'd still like to meet some of these non-gcc using pcb users.
> 

Oh, even an apparently modest bump of GCC version can cause significant
differences in warning behaviour. And many people are using clang now,
although it currently has troubles with the kernel, clobbering the
interrupt flag behind the kernel's back.

    Gabriel

- Raw text -