X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb import schematic crash, parantheses in netname
Date:	Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:07:29 +0100
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<nauuv2$m6r$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<20160215215221 DOT fd472794e7b9446a243bfc40 AT gmail DOT com> <201602152055 DOT u1FKtM4K011038 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160215220938 DOT bbc7eaa59d827cd0b261ea97 AT gmail DOT com> <D3167F4D-4750-49F8-9125-BDC4937F5C69 AT noqsi DOT com> <201602152135 DOT u1FLZrw9012774 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7F210DE7-0A0B-42F9-ABBE-2C2768621186 AT noqsi DOT com> <20160216081722 DOT 1065cbed6653d3da4ffc7498 AT gmail DOT com> <201602160724 DOT u1G7Ox26001785 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160216085628 DOT b70143c330cd4da98a4603d3 AT gmail DOT com> <201602160805 DOT u1G85d8c003148 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160216092912 DOT 7f7439f703b49175a21dbb1b AT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q_w5NunkojiCr36RHRTq0hJ+PZP1e0GumTRMoGXcvgRXQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201602161715 DOT u1GHFMBB028078 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAC4O8c9jr_b376SpuUk5HrJApP1c75oxsEBemn-i_xtC-rt-Zw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201602162032 DOT u1GKWL7Y005291 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAC4O8c-ig=0UVAqagNXH_DBmC9uVQDu3Y1Gx7LBGmRCo0-_kVQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E75ECBB6-14E7-437A-B374-E0CF86BDFF1A AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8z4JiJr=mgA+co4pX-yxu_pVsXpeKRYqneuxZNnYqh8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AB351427-7E!08-4412-A796-03E850F2411A AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8ejSN3GrmB1Zw=Dx9Pm-3Y0jwjNs=yjmwgsqcoVW5ACw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <59CE9019-7A56-49D6-BC2B-680A7253B055 AT noqsi DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-43-9.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.14.10
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

John Doty wrote:

>> as well since it will help gschem stay viable long-term,
> 
> Gschem has no such problem.

CERN chose kicad rather than gschem for their open hardware 
initiative. Same with a number of high profile open hardware projects. 
See http://kicad-pcb.org/made-with-kicad/ for some examples. 

Please don't delude yourself int the perception everything is working 
alright, when it clearly isn't.


> It has been stable and productive for
> well over a decade.

Just like pcb. Only that in this case it is decades.

 
>> since pcb does have most of the users
> 
> A common assertion without any data to back it up.

Do you remember the poll I did a while ago? The results were non-
ambiguous.


> Pcb users don’t generally seem to want something like gschem.

Can we get past this kindergarten style of conversation, please?

---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -