X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=rBo2Yfmr/Lbuk7rmyA1cO98IiWDBquDpP3RRM3DDVRQ=;
	b=WdQBAlNXNuL99yAlF29MB5gJU+Jhvc+uO1Lf97F7V9YhJCKakjJkM1pxRxJYksa4Eg
	i7c3V4XI6niUSis6a0HfENL7vpGvSoktSTEQg/ybCoEXdE+beOSKsDPc7ttjsBmgm1fV
	lg4Ss5eOq6FQJQCfl6EwLSKO+tVE34sZaGPAmwLjDEUpRILKt2e9umJGiWlZxCvQYuQ9
	a7MgDkp10OlhO/cwoXYfS264jKc9oTCo/ZPSo7buZ8GOScR2Ouehaw4KdLp4Hefw8aqn
	y1mKvwX5t67xhRqRzTeoJuGZHSBll2oYSHO8iJu2xLhCv3Z1xch+d902Rz7ICNCeIsWW
	XZVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=rBo2Yfmr/Lbuk7rmyA1cO98IiWDBquDpP3RRM3DDVRQ=;
	b=S4GU+Bak13KqDP4VlCA/YzvQjwEsrxAsn8fII1u2zWvVvQX2HbvRD4Zgwn5n6hhcdr
	C3kggLfalItRHjVtfVuK8Xi26ttarpUc3JRe2BOfrPCuzCnb6cEmTfR3DzHmoj022GYA
	OPeG4KOVcQ04A0EpPWmgdCFS9CXDTcVcCHncOgvxZWve5cU94X+2ybPSBrWgDyUnQHdv
	JtWgBZSQOa634rW2niyg5TYzki1UZXmD5v3qzfFXy8Hy9u5JTnoWqC+l1NVINSwi+ZgB
	wRK1MCSD52ButVG+2IAl+VC7cBkRbdpcb/OS9cRAg2e8BRi7ZrKVJfhC8p610aWpiav8
	cj1w==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YOROVdadj+uDhuhCymUtmF1ZMqPfIvu2r7Tti51j21pvZqCAWK4zcuAbvYd4ywHtD34sR0cZn9EqesDWEw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.28.173.143 with SMTP id w137mr102419wme.101.1456425529252;
	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:38:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<201602251657.u1PGvN4Z002963@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<CAC4O8c9WiJWVhitB4kX7tspJQkZT1RYEn62JzqwvZZmUNeBwXQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602242140 DOT u1OLe6e5023051 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-caJvCs0LWGOP1N0hgJRqCXCYB9b966r7Wow050Lm4_g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602250326 DOT u1P3Q2bF003329 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_qLQtwew4-3eLLsbh8nomNUsc8X8X-Nwfx4_MqKWpO8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602250358 DOT u1P3w5GD004211 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_WM1CTtxJvGskv=ZHZO0T3Sgz_czU62VgjygsGOcksmg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602251657 DOT u1PGvN4Z002963 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:38:49 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_DQnS4gUyJ0xDWXSoNjwyP313ZzKdX2pDMZH1TAVAJ1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Import schematics doesn't fully honor
	Settings->Import New Elements At->Mark
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:57 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> It's not a big deal either way, it just looked like a reasonable
>> option to simplify things.  Is this the only way the mark function is
>> overloaded, or are there others that you know of?
>
> It's also used when converting buffers to elements, and in general,
> when dealing with buffers at all (although it's implicit).

For me it looks like convert buffer to element uses the point that was
clicked when the selection to be converted was cut or copied, the mark
seems to be ignored.  This is for sure another case where the click is
significant and useful though.  If there were some way for the UI to
announce how it's going to interpret that click (eg new element
centroid) or something.  A lot of these things are minority operations
and it may not be worth it though.

> Elements also have a "mark" so think of the ctrl-M mark as "a mark"
> instead of "the mark".

Do these two different things that get referred to as mark have
anything in common?

- Raw text -