X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ER2EXnqZzDrdsjsIkqIXSfKnxBIpa4AkBGW8UhTiPAs=;
	b=jH1R8usI+/7cJx+pCKaG3u8d6bgbOEfskRwqDthNERjm9+NhoXXyzIs5BaZmwO6M54
	l38Pjttr+DTQArzKSEA8DO2FFwN9kz/llNXSsAscN+kPI7dqA2icveabuYcZyALh78OB
	yMI8MJ89wmuVgHzVBFVOPafvQHCYWxyB4lE4pAwl+tyIBFMDsCa8IYf+xjgX9M6DltlH
	0f9UfMQhT51O3Q406FafNrWaCRucqCyRWkSdDraeJnEaFQUV00tzFJieWUQy95oGN8ph
	jm9kxWn1ZEOVxrtrM6E3eYCuWwWVwlRqie+oyKwQnl7C/B0aazRTg73mpf0vq0FZwdcD
	CpTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ER2EXnqZzDrdsjsIkqIXSfKnxBIpa4AkBGW8UhTiPAs=;
	b=VqnPoM/PWvLrBtGtnNrgqhith0yPvVHXT3e8Js7exicLyzfr4FOWl1SBV0gT1gZjCh
	3q/1rl0Rt57xzW2qC4al/w1IyQspbmW2VlRWF4ZuXXunz5iKosfE4TroO73jBILKnYqj
	e3Fz3kAigBHl+Z/dPezL86w93sYDd/Vfi2DCi2++Y1cWBfgQqTXLolCPM2sJpT2jFvtw
	BX9tg/PqOX4kj27V9UZ7FJaM2IA5xi+lFBrhk6gqz8yDU/nOMmuwptiIzIU0SvKwlCzF
	wbEqlzVF9BWIQHXBqg6TND+ZYIF1IhRCJv2T9sWgx/P4N6B9nVcTG0Fb01Vux+0ji1JS
	9UWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YORm35ZEZTcKRIMMQRCpEAGX7ROgRPcbVysbmxD6hWvpKsT1OIuK5G5DfT6dkM47QUSK1YfG9Bnbl1mIkg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.90.137 with SMTP id bw9mr41784557wjb.120.1456370398018;
	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:19:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<59CE9019-7A56-49D6-BC2B-680A7253B055@noqsi.com>
References:	<20160215215221 DOT fd472794e7b9446a243bfc40 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201602152055 DOT u1FKtM4K011038 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160215220938 DOT bbc7eaa59d827cd0b261ea97 AT gmail DOT com>
	<D3167F4D-4750-49F8-9125-BDC4937F5C69 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201602152135 DOT u1FLZrw9012774 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<7F210DE7-0A0B-42F9-ABBE-2C2768621186 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20160216081722 DOT 1065cbed6653d3da4ffc7498 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201602160724 DOT u1G7Ox26001785 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160216085628 DOT b70143c330cd4da98a4603d3 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201602160805 DOT u1G85d8c003148 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160216092912 DOT 7f7439f703b49175a21dbb1b AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_w5NunkojiCr36RHRTq0hJ+PZP1e0GumTRMoGXcvgRXQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602161715 DOT u1GHFMBB028078 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9jr_b376SpuUk5HrJApP1c75oxsEBemn-i_xtC-rt-Zw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602162032 DOT u1GKWL7Y005291 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-ig=0UVAqagNXH_DBmC9uVQDu3Y1Gx7LBGmRCo0-_kVQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E75ECBB6-14E7-437A-B374-E0CF86BDFF1A AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8z4JiJr=mgA+co4pX-yxu_pVsXpeKRYqneuxZNnYqh8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8ejSN3GrmB1Zw=Dx9Pm-3Y0jwjNs=yjmwgsqcoVW5ACw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<59CE9019-7A56-49D6-BC2B-680A7253B055 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:19:57 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c-Hb+gpG3umUuRLUXTu5Vm3phYg56Y7mySFcHb2s_TAbA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb import schematic crash, parantheses in netname
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u1P3K6S3020056
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:44 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2016, at 9:54 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>>  This is actually very much in
>> your interest
>
> Don’t insult me by pretending you have my interest at heart.

I'm not pretending.  I didn't say they were my #1 priority, I just
noted that they were in line with what would be the sane behavior
here.

>> as well since it will help gschem stay viable long-term,
>
> Gschem has no such problem. It has been stable and productive for well over a decade.

Eventually it'll need porting to a new gtk, or you'll be stuck on an old distro.

>> since pcb does have most of the users
>
> A common assertion without any data to back it up.

Never complain about pcb-centric development again then.

Britton

- Raw text -