X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=BqFzkIZjIXmoBZWMo51isDfpjO2UBFfZQNHiS99+Mx0=;
	b=BONmZvysvEpN/LNMuontahAMk1q068BkVvdv7h+SxsP91Q8rHIWyVaQJHtIWTh7WIE
	Sd1MG2z1FfkrTSrVnrwnrJ63LEVquTACuOuh/sxiUJ5TVjAcalJCoPzUc4AhJuDANImb
	8FxuFt/uPcmTf9AdKGO889pgp/AZP/wmb74pRZCDPkKk8nQVKN2kLVTGQ31hmIaNpkqg
	I64TLf7MrHokxTxh26FsW1SvidReIrc4adyrmcdIGhQJRF1rbm2fVt9sZtC6unWgC0PK
	Lrox5VYhpriHPiQuiPmPyCzTktWJR0JmTcHky85pYgHR8dp8jMLY+qjgc/vsXdqzKR+n
	klLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=BqFzkIZjIXmoBZWMo51isDfpjO2UBFfZQNHiS99+Mx0=;
	b=mDaEmGiYiatIfUK0wizZHCNxW9UgVhjVhV6SqkmaR1rr38BUJqpq37aWWqfDXPDudW
	GNfK1Cg10hdkgKXb3RVOnAdoHlOl0VqGLkwS4oTBXymXTTxaB8+Tt5L//NxFKNcdaAm5
	Y/9NY3kfMZKnOzY0Hol4/D8W+o4iV7AVF/jwI5aUCfLe2k09sPGAacvD+6qAWgNEHTdz
	AxTJGfUx35ObATFjJ/ZTtid+T4OQxLOJ8wR0gYXz/G+HvTIuktKQhY10IK0EtGgolMby
	c2EXw0fPkN3qnMPfl+ov6CoPbJRVIJz9Wt5Rc7fAYCbem/nJtvMbQHwm9pzcIMGvyYQT
	//qw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YOQ2XuSsisakPOSiQXLkO0PIGaglObWUA1E5kwj738T4z0t12u5RFnRwITl5yUzKbKuYUh8OMLwkU3+Tjw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.28.23.73 with SMTP id 70mr1282221wmx.37.1455239122944; Thu,
	11 Feb 2016 17:05:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<56BC043D.6080502@plastitar.com>
References:	<CAC4O8c_ACXqSG7nC56a+GsTf0sy1_4+N5ivZU37X+mb92k+n1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201601252210 DOT u0PMA0uc031097 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q81ec_4DRuhL9KGRm=zTCzXr+C-ghM03se5fiGWam8Yjw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<n8b8av$odq$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<201601272015 DOT u0RKFlKO010736 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<n9gt82$ani$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<56BC043D DOT 6080502 AT plastitar DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:05:22 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_xkZbrYhOAJ6GjXsyq+Zndg91hENhD9KWc993L7LbyTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb_fprintf mixes mm and mils for same output object
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:47 PM, P. Taylor <phil AT plastitar DOT com> wrote:
> On 2/10/2016 9:56 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>>
>> In my humble opinion mixing metric with imperial is not a a compromise but
>> worse than strictly sticking to imperial.
>>
>> ---<)kaimartin(>---
>
> Nonsense.

Not at all, he's absolutely right.

> Imperial / metric.  They are both arbitrary and as far as EDA goes there is
> no fundamental reason for either being better.

Metric is better for all the usual widely recognized reasons, besides
the fact that as Kai points out all the new parts use it.
Mixing the two is super weird and likely to cause confusion.

> What they did with PCB using thou/mm's is brilliant.  Why shouldn't the
> computer be used to solve for these little problems that nobody wants to
> face?

Because "the computer" (i.e. pcb software) does not and cannot solve
the problem the way it's trying to do it, it can only take a guess at
what the user might have meant.  Did you read my first post where I
reported the issue?  The approach has been carried over from
footprints, where it makes a small amount of sense, to other objects,
where it makes no sense at all.

> AND you get to interface to your imperial chassis hole pattern with ease, or
> your metric chassis hole pattern with ease.

Converting your chasis dimensions is trivial and its not worth having
pcb do something weird and torturous to save that operation.

Britton

- Raw text -