X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=XUh60LexHEE41ITSfRXp0HXbXjx1nQ8saHXjclIU69s=;
	b=ki4+UbE/tSds/1O9qavUzW6aBP9qRLpTJj6jskDcvIkqhS91i5E2nEm1oskAZ5QpsL
	VLqoX23zN/2Wfpt/g/9Qak3AQNriXMjwQ8dc7hT0to+Qqn10T+DRuZJ/2UMUbJxD3akD
	cSA/+8kMhEVuPQpLqCk1CJyeQddwz9kYQV754sHKQ0MDLCdKeINTfLcWJHJRXpjoOvpi
	W2JM9LS+1G0+poO8AgSiqGXPCCF5UMBcmgmlOrE7wFelkZ91AKmfA3h2SkvkAG9u00/L
	STdqd9iTWaAddVtHE8xngMtJcukfTolZVqDmrCIPSx8A5Ytyxgr/aPJSdljUJKGJX0AU
	9GUw==
X-Received:	by 10.112.205.10 with SMTP id lc10mr24814705lbc.31.1451594166608;
	Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2015 21:36:01 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] (design error in the core of gschem --> Annotated
	schematic)
Message-Id:	<20151231213601.64a9550ba8e44dccbe75ed4a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<42C12FD5-878A-4FC3-A1EB-DF14BC57E018@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512290406210 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQ363RydhBJKMnNX5sLOkD1K4qVwb-PPwov3MT3D6MfdQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQD1b0NKLWNYyB-m1whgYJZeEH9syzSs4OZt+22D5hooA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300441390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<7C27D3F4-9CC2-46DB-BE88-77564F3FC0FC AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20151230192636 DOT fc377052d1b3314ceb5fd4c7 AT gmail DOT com>
	<E77C0BE0-EAAE-494E-927B-B745BAB94F76 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20151230203226 DOT 0fca70d4bc42aeac7d73d1ad AT gmail DOT com>
	<CC638130-4330-4A0C-81EF-0A3E5C4169F9 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CADL2oCV_WyeGuq33s3H9nLjaN7Z+mu7rjHv3gUx8ikY1jTG5jQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<42C12FD5-878A-4FC3-A1EB-DF14BC57E018 AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:47:06 -0700
John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

> 
> On Dec 31, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> > Forward annotation is a lot simpler than backward and is probably a lot better choice for all data that are added after the schematic is done like for example a such simple thing as some of the common fields in the header. It may also be useful for simulation output. Basically it make sense for all data added later in the design flow.
> > 
> > Are you able add the attributes to the symbols to get "graphical" output?
> 
> I’m not sure what you mean.
> 
> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com

In the annotated schematic do the text end up on the schematic or in a table or similar somewhere?

- Raw text -