X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
	:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=kWuxu/fHuuwChQt8g0z5cpHyirdS/GGr0GcxnWZFE+4=;
	b=dltJPRlyYBz+LAG4J+8ebJCPMlr0agHznzgzpwLuDhPqDvkoQ54OVTwNYLGM2gCX7z
	c+/k5qd5abrqJT0gdCbYJpnW2UqM1nroecHDzMumHzxPDhZkSN5HSaWXrDZe6OPRgHj/
	xuJc9HSo/y0D7LnKharbYbJVTRDBKfmjWbofM/Z/ol41wb+YoemX1LrBoUENXFj9ateB
	O2GUukcz/LkYTJW12+PL5zAZ9SfWkh0j+goW6iN1Jz4+82C+dzisGk8whj0DGuX4y0JO
	I8yoCCVMlgeRWfTm8na3GuPF64zvaz8OlT4gtvKJHEjxtQxtbqKqqAgM5AP0cR3afxmc
	OrYA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.60.54.133 with SMTP id j5mr46557633oep.2.1451561698812; Thu,
	31 Dec 2015 03:34:58 -0800 (PST)
Sender:	svenn DOT bjerkem AT gmail DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<6C7F0F54-B8B8-43F5-B96D-2BA8E98CBA4D@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAGde_xN_GRE6+g2sqobRbBxbHrY5jU2PP82w2-aJrLfis7kNPw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151230185342 DOT GC4099 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAGde_xPc5kABhoCMOQTGUEtQ4kbFP1wcXYQmVwUDJVXmP0VfVA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<6C7F0F54-B8B8-43F5-B96D-2BA8E98CBA4D AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:34:58 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth:	x_uQUL4sguhqxn04dMeL4UqqlRg
Message-ID:	<CAGde_xNkpi4_fWZSF5=TWSWXXMDcg7a_7kgaaTBrHyOPgNzzrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] How to get readline support in gschem REPL?
From:	"Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBVBZ2Tj008269
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 31 December 2015 at 03:59, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>> Can the REPL in gschem create a netlist?
>
> I think it can in principle, as it has access to the data. But I think it would take a lot of work. Gschem lacks the gnetlist infrastructure. It would be like writing a compiler in your text editor’s macro language.

Ok, this was the statement I was looking for. The complexity of the task.

>
>> I want to bypass gnetlist,
>
> Why not just launch gnetlist from gschem? You can do that.
>

If I want to get rid of gnetlist in my flow because it hampers my
design flow because of its limitations, why should I bother?

-- 
Svenn

- Raw text -