X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=RyaWZncvb1RvvqUl1c+5nEVROizAcCCTSPRGzXIoFpA=;
	b=an14HHjZZJbcO5Fxduowf+ixY1q+aQR0/f6M1aHG1zDgRqXr9lGkFSmjG6qpBgLeqY
	NILyzkpXSsgqVqzQGoYX3NRUmkqWkLIcu2MAEXatNfKBnqZ8LuRWXhAKyChBoXOk7nVV
	od5TaSvQ0XiSCRN0soo8/VIq/kg/WzX+2X2DuXnfa0fZTqoKdGX0mUCOGWk10eiyTkD6
	nqUFTcBk4yn8Z/IQrrC8x7ShawSt/GBQQlRTHeiCzDfefqBSB5ZflhWrWEbxuedV1bg5
	axmohsuuvFQhU4A/Z/2/IgRqZh7YpGSS/x7YyU3wIeyor5pF+CxVsFPPdK6We3zTuSvM
	jcMg==
X-Received:	by 10.25.153.79 with SMTP id b76mr16973559lfe.102.1451527022143;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2015 04:56:59 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of
	gschem)
Message-ID:	<20151231015659.GA19555@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512290406210 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQ363RydhBJKMnNX5sLOkD1K4qVwb-PPwov3MT3D6MfdQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQD1b0NKLWNYyB-m1whgYJZeEH9syzSs4OZt+22D5hooA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300441390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<E8E70657-A89A-4F51-B779-C24E029ABECA AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRLu4-C0U7t7SjqFp=b++t3A+hxzGoVna8Q4Tx_sALxFw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<F676A431-C1E3-454B-B156-A3D8C6497B37 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhR=a09yVKGh_wkMg33B03K+eF-YGytMJFj7LqQNDFAgHQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhR=a09yVKGh_wkMg33B03K+eF-YGytMJFj7LqQNDFAgHQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 05:53:03AM +0000, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 5:40 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. PCB exports a set of commands (I call it a patch)
> >>>
> >>> An interface. Good. Is it documented?
> >>
> >> So far no one except me is interested in merging it. Why document
> >> something no one else has accepted?
> >
> > Documentation is an important part of acceptance. Gnet-spice-sdb remains very important because it’s better documented than gnet-spice-noqsi even though the latter is more capable. Mea culpa. So many things to finish…
> 
> Now I have the last house of the night. This one has a door and is
> nothing but windows. You live in it, it is glass, now stop throwing
> stones.
> 
> You need to get off this high horse of being the guardian of geda. No
> one has ever touted you as that. No on asked you to be that. I don't
> see anyone supporting you in that. The real question is why are we all
> indulging you? You expect everything down to methodically written
> documentation to be done before *you* let stuff be considered. Not
> merged but just considered. This is the hight of arrogance really.

Please, please, don't state such strong things about John's intentions.
AFAICS, he is speaking about his own backend which would be more
acceptable if it would have more documentation.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -