X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4PDKDWwrSF9DNy4R6bHb3SyDa8uVXNHO9+8XG76br2o=;
	b=y4HpHHWTWtCiGBoyHa+mszl4OBmabwckt1npRJ01x1VoFwFzrDDDb2sbb1RDEQ0J4a
	ZmNGvWPmly7t5IZygbwVljnXSk2AuzeI+3sPghf+WLF0MlSogG+zJzjROEZl9QZ6VtYs
	63ZQnBMqXfNRhknhjPKfGnd/EaouZj9SiBtRfU1WVcRQacn5v57xbCPm4wYc4pPF4RcT
	PEn/BCQMWs9M1scANNo+QeFvGhmnLtg4+mWt8C+sq1kvBvjR9mhbUG1uZCMLjcorO/OQ
	yQyMkHECqIkyQyd4kKqZS4f0M/OsK81OeDFss7SajcxwwZHs2qVim2C0Ac2n1JzqmJoc
	yWLA==
X-Received:	by 10.194.201.134 with SMTP id ka6mr70994480wjc.116.1451482508045;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 05:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:35:03 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user]
	Project leadership
Message-Id:	<20151230143503.73191266a2cfc3b594f1cf2d@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAMvDHVD9_AwfekEV4vJ7hmScC8wPUb0qXsZgFU_hQvQ2ESqYkw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAMvDHVATJYfLUkL+5AkD31BVTbg5OdKTvZc2LVh=7Kf6Y-95EA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAD2FfiHeUtsRWtYENR-LX=DuSHWw3AEtmeCLbb40x9gUcYnjmw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAMvDHVD9_AwfekEV4vJ7hmScC8wPUb0qXsZgFU_hQvQ2ESqYkw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On 12/30/15, Richard Hughes (hughsient AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> ...
> > Just over 0.1% of people on githb are contributing to scheme projects:
> 
> Add to it other lisps and lispy languages such as CL, elisp,
> chicken, bigloo, clojure, racket and so on.
> 
> And if you don't yet know, guile is not only scheme, you already
> can use elisp, ecmascript (AKA javascript), brainf*ck and probably
> some other language within it.
> 
> And throw out your emacs with its elisp and all its lispy
> interface (with all those ugly paredits and geisers). Tall boys
> use gedit!
> 
> (Please don't take this seriously and personally, I'm just
> kidding).
> 
> Thanks,
>   Vladimir

No problem I got the point. The most powerlessness situations are then you are not allowed to use ugly words although they are needed to express you really mean it.

- Raw text -