Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/12/29/15:52:35
--Apple-Mail=_C39C3ED2-23E5-4D5C-9A69-DBF09BCE8F6F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=windows-1252
On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Kovacs Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via =
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:43:17 -0500
> "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" =
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>=20
>> gEDA is struggling for a lack of development and scheme turns off a
>> lot of wood be contributors. We need people who....
>> 1. Don't fight so much.
>> 2. Know about EDA software.
>> 3. Have time to work on the project.
>> 4. Know all the languages involved in the project.
>>=20
>> That is a lot to ask.
>=20
> Yes.
>=20
> gEDA is too conservative - I believe. gEDA states it is 'open'. It is =
open
> source, but the people are closed, and afraid of new technology.
Not at all. But don=92t break old tools: add new ones.
> We move on,
> or die.
You don=92t have to make unwelcome changes to extend the toolkit. That=92s=
an advantage of a toolkit. Use it.
>=20
> I gave up convincing everyone that we need to change this and that.
Why not just write something? A new gnetlist back end or plugin. A new =
script to transform schematics. A new Scheme plugin for gschem. *Use* =
the power of the foundation rather than try to change it. When you do =
that, you don=92t have to convince anybody.
>=20
> I'm so tired of all this. I also have 1000 things to do. I also wrote =
some
> scripts for gEDA, and I fear that I have to throw them away... not =
because
> the project will evolve into something new, but because, I have to =
change the
> toolset.
That=92s part of my concern also. That=92s a strong reason for stable =
foundations.
>=20
> However, I think gEDA is still a good idea. A set of tools, =
communicating on
> well defined interfaces. I still think this is the way to go... but if =
we
> continue this endless discussions without any direction, we are going =
to do it
> for ourselves, just for its own sake, which makes no sense.
>=20
> Think!
>=20
> Levente
>=20
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com
--Apple-Mail=_C39C3ED2-23E5-4D5C-9A69-DBF09BCE8F6F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=4Dcx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_C39C3ED2-23E5-4D5C-9A69-DBF09BCE8F6F--
- Raw text -