Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/12/29/15:46:13
--Apple-Mail=_3A205BBD-B01D-47E6-9546-14B1FB5DF70E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=windows-1252
On Dec 29, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via =
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
> [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:23:37PM -0500, Evan Foss =
(evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> ...
>>>> appreciate Edward's work though I feel we see geda-gaf future
>>>> differently. I, for one, wish to unify geda core functions and
>>>> rewrite them in Scheme in order to get rid of our C-Scheme-C
>>>> structure, throw out duplicated functionality, simplify internal
>>>> structure, and make functions less opaque for both C and Scheme
>>>> levels. (BTW, gschem has REPL now, are you aware of it? ;))
>>>=20
>>> A while back we debated this. I though we agreed on de-emphasising
>>> scheme's use? (You and peter b were the only too proponents for it) =
I
>>=20
>> Who? You and Kai-Martin ;) ?
>=20
> There were a lot of other people who felt that scheme was something we
> need to de-emphasis in use. The single largest group of scheme
> developers I know of was MIT students and they don't teach it any
> more.
>=20
> gEDA is struggling for a lack of development
Pcb is struggling from the lack of a foundation. I think geda-gaf would =
be much more popular if there was a good free/open layout program to =
export to. If KiCAD ever documents their netlist format=85
> and scheme turns off a
> lot of wood be contributors. We need people who....
> 1. Don't fight so much.
> 2. Know about EDA software.
> 3. Have time to work on the project.
> 4. Know all the languages involved in the project.
>=20
> That is a lot to ask.
>=20
> Kai-Martin and I were not the only two.
>=20
>> I never said scheme is over-emphasised in geda-gaf. AFAIR, I always
>> stated the opposite: Scheme is 'under-emphasized' as a scripting
>> language in geda.
>=20
> I think something got missed in translation. I was saying you and
> peter were the only two who wanted to keep advancing scheme's use in
> geda.
>=20
>>> could be miss interpreting your plan here but it sounds like you are
>>> going to replace more of the C with Scheme.
>>=20
>> Yeah, that's my plan :)
Good plan.
>=20
> Sorry but I oppose this plan and I think I can gather a lot of =
support.
Go over to the Xorn camp, then. That=92s where the non-Scheme action is. =
It might very well be the future.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com
--Apple-Mail=_3A205BBD-B01D-47E6-9546-14B1FB5DF70E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=oi5r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_3A205BBD-B01D-47E6-9546-14B1FB5DF70E--
- Raw text -