X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=DcurCZkzdW1UQ7pFrX1zo8JMLEl7ae0k93zc1r4eSF8=;
	b=sDcT1Bdtrj14DHRKSFiwzbPizjpXcrbRimKMDVx9wxkzR1Q76XIJimx6u8NzjsUyX5
	9bZ6cbO819SobOxUcpi+RNFh2N+b5gTT11fV9ZD+QR5/AhZJ2kKr2yq/uHFfh8s4pEhs
	ovL/JVFLJs+nOSU7aThqjlX9NxIj+ulZiz8tTzlyD6uRfm2P/PiWWb4xX/Vsv6nISl1k
	cpTTsAT1aS0u1aC+ZCUBnlWvoaBstKHPuUHNrlbDrRScZJaGUP2BsMvjGVY6DNWv+TQC
	hTnS/bCuRV8QEinps+IQYvcHfXCXlIJ0Q3Y2TseSDLwpRIBEt1SJMPSKmEYIqVm0ODAc
	3v9Q==
X-Received:	by 10.25.18.66 with SMTP id h63mr12348889lfi.11.1451416425403;
	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:13:45 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 22:13:42 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
Message-ID:	<20151229191342.GF3752@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<CAJXU7q_GnuGNMtUWkB-xgBiKgY5R5W4ZCjtnz5EJizG+46dm1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C7FDF8B6-B335-46C3-8A25-F95ACECF4B79 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhS2bg=Rjuq6oEeOacV7PfUENy_jq7dxag=vWsUbdH6pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5681E059 DOT 9070202 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20151229171221 DOT GB3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAM2RGhQTDOK3WBEUbS4-re3Wg9EnP56x8rJP0cOFUMDhMk5FvA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhQTDOK3WBEUbS4-re3Wg9EnP56x8rJP0cOFUMDhMk5FvA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:23:37PM -0500, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> > appreciate Edward's work though I feel we see geda-gaf future
> > differently. I, for one, wish to unify geda core functions and
> > rewrite them in Scheme in order to get rid of our C-Scheme-C
> > structure, throw out duplicated functionality, simplify internal
> > structure, and make functions less opaque for both C and Scheme
> > levels. (BTW, gschem has REPL now, are you aware of it? ;))
> 
> A while back we debated this. I though we agreed on de-emphasising
> scheme's use? (You and peter b were the only too proponents for it) I

Who? You and Kai-Martin ;) ?

I never said scheme is over-emphasised in geda-gaf. AFAIR, I always
stated the opposite: Scheme is 'under-emphasized' as a scripting
language in geda.

> could be miss interpreting your plan here but it sounds like you are
> going to replace more of the C with Scheme.

Yeah, that's my plan :)

> 
> I was not aware of REPL but that is handy.

Don't think I would stop my work on geda just now ;) I still hope
we'll make it better some day.

BTW, I've found emacs has a plugin named geiser which is very
powerful and would be convenient for many scheme users. I've managed
to set up geda for using it the same way as in guile though I'm still
in doubt guile users will use it.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -