X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1451415490; bh=c0ZRbaR84RH+YG25h0dpbmCS4F/ZUH1n1uXDnaWGfrE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From:Subject; b=pd68oScRo1RYA+UoDCN8KnOngUpJJya68qdOk7VL/IeOuMfJ7bMEEeIrcdLIFYC61CmpZaLlGPN2IgHtA1DOWWmREKiRmejUFDQQUMrhlr+/3KqBBE1zPiKG9bZCzqSrxVCn1YEZChRCyqh0KGcjKSnueARaX7G4hkamj5BXc1sfyNGD7pZ6gGSxM3gnSnupkrornbO6YAkUFOINhhfkUKHL9UZG7g1QQU2EkfvKz1dl3rWLQNJmLh9zMWQ6bk4aa4CeqjyXM4DZ/a3Y+D6g+8BzXEshCsUQWW1WMVXbuVDGcLPQXDn+XJpQOYjMIhob9uX4ry1RemKejY4zXNQVbA==
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:	591515 DOT 990 DOT bm AT smtp236 DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:	ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG:	eX1yQ4cVM1mzSexn65OiSclCR5vHbwzS2hF8ZY7uPlxdjc8
	jZV.EC80NIRaw5wKH_3awd.RwqSvXnbltXPGkU5kPayq1Eq9Ue1N8JI9lfeE
	qmdbHExR1jO5mZFPU4ykI9vrWVOpGkzKdPeG4Mv4eayTrcdk617scorzN38T
	9R5TS3rhANyda8tVvAjK0js6WgBRuVcmz74FVHREsxSgiMPV8tAE8GDx1rlb
	Nto.tnTAxYElrSR7djCBVveL34zwDRwInQ4lZwcttVY7KHJXhK.L9incfqgM
	dUqANAny3LS9g2mPfqgex8f4NbnFTdwIbdXwztBg9YXn0S6P6BDX3O4rJkY9
	wvqeLUM92TyDNyMjzMY0lTecVxhNOR4OvqgvQb7cn2EmjmKGtUDKTAxq1AYo
	uDPtHnFSiACxAV1k9LMq6PmorbQa_dxbzQ3esdlp6s1UgQ7msq0LGRN3NjWT
	UoJ7jVgtmdB4Vn44SfYfKdByue.2xJyAw3BcAcWt.Lzi4LE8k9bYXGVoQX0Y
	4qkKCyztJMXGfK0gL_0m65JDk0SYCsrf0kuirnpzUUY7IGO0-
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	b8jVkbOswBAqZ4BhECp7nxPJUfTGEnEGv_G4qgQeZMeAbA--
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
From:	"Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhQTDOK3WBEUbS4-re3Wg9EnP56x8rJP0cOFUMDhMk5FvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:58:08 -0800
Message-Id:	<A02EEBBC-54A4-4A59-9525-07D05719E802@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <CAJXU7q_GnuGNMtUWkB-xgBiKgY5R5W4ZCjtnz5EJizG+46dm1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <C7FDF8B6-B335-46C3-8A25-F95ACECF4B79 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAM2RGhS2bg=Rjuq6oEeOacV7PfUENy_jq7dxag=vWsUbdH6pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5681E059 DOT 9070202 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20151229171221 DOT GB3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAM2RGhQTDOK3WBEUbS4-re3Wg9EnP56x8rJP0cOFUMDhMk5FvA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
To:	"geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBTIwEAu018871
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
>> appreciate Edward's work though I feel we see geda-gaf future
>> differently. I, for one, wish to unify geda core functions and
>> rewrite them in Scheme in order to get rid of our C-Scheme-C
>> structure, throw out duplicated functionality, simplify internal
>> structure, and make functions less opaque for both C and Scheme
>> levels. (BTW, gschem has REPL now, are you aware of it? ;))
> 
> A while back we debated this. I though we agreed on de-emphasising
> scheme's use? (You and peter b were the only too proponents for it) I
> could be miss interpreting your plan here but it sounds like you are
> going to replace more of the C with Scheme.

I’d rather have libgeda written in pure C and provide support for GIR.
Then, other languages can use libgeda through the FFI. The bindings
would be automatically generated, so we don’t have to code them by hand.

Ed

- Raw text -