www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references | |
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to | |
:user-agent; | |
bh=1lUWCyCWiL12F3xKtIREZrpwAZt1Ui71IHySWgXLZyg=; | |
b=CdD/SGrGz29hapOkYcGdIPcMigs8am6FRn2UArHtQaAzBQS7QmwVukwWkoV41D2/UJ | |
6ABCAdUD7HT1rEto2FJ44eIP84EFwQUiYP5f6nk+ndjlmnbNskeNJzgfNKFwEq02ztB4 | |
up4s2qHhrwd1iJgHe75rKBoJ1mcFJ9ffpVp4kJuOOIwSlbSTCrs+23xwKPWMBdhqPZDF | |
3wbPMn796t9GUMugP07Q/A4/hVxW6TFNgVBvm3o8PqVWwSKlZ/2I8ozT9TmdWBYZRBeU | |
++Iyy4cep6hjxgjuHMrxtl+9hhH+yGBqnuO8vju7CZ248xBKIUYlXFcpKgGjfoqCLblC | |
qPOA== | |
X-Received: | by 10.25.170.210 with SMTP id t201mr23012436lfe.16.1451413826819; |
Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:30:26 -0800 (PST) | |
Date: | Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:30:24 +0300 |
From: | "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Project leadership |
Message-ID: | <20151229183023.GE3752@localhost.localdomain> |
Mail-Followup-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C@noqsi.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:48:34PM -0700, John Doty wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:53 AM, Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > > Currently, badly needed development rarely occurs because those > > people who are capable do not contribute because they are put off > > by a few users who want NOTHING to change because it does not > > fit their personal work flow. > > > > There are really two projects here: The original gEDA (now confusingly called geda-gaf), and pcb. I think everyone agrees that pcb needs a lot of work. On the other hand, geda-gaf is matiure, effective, and easy to extend with scripting. Pcb development requires a great deal of collaboration. Geda-gaf development mostly does not, as anybody can write and publish a script. > > There would be much less controversy if these projects were separated. They represent radically different development patterns: conflating them causes much confusion and strife. +1 I believe separating projects (discussions) would made them more fruitful.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |