X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=KEzRobkfi8/Jc7/Bf48bBysC8Xty5RRJozNbWxKhYzI=;
	b=Jd+yrvovplZcjhGJCqLB90Kse74EwtA0OdvuYEec43DLRNO+QkZf4+QrbLnofbz1fz
	TfFtPu6HkQZnlIR+MFA9kce253AHn1a5zWAhr7cCGIu/waT0RoyDa3XBmaQoVx30DBoo
	niTn25VqZJ50O/o8YxOuxtjHhEKEST+MW/hlV6aiafzu1YhKWeNpLS2EtPU8xrMKgJ8z
	H8+jLPM7ZNhDsDSPLcze5keCN1IfjvV4IK6z7zY6YZdJLGuEmiFVGD0x0GEm069OVxgY
	C9sgRze82NecIBKWFJEa1ilyx183h7Y76a9k1lRFrx8yudgfE/zkBm6ryMVnEGP+yY51
	80OA==
X-Received:	by 10.25.43.212 with SMTP id r203mr15611973lfr.162.1451409143980;
	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 20:12:21 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
Message-ID:	<20151229171221.GB3752@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_GnuGNMtUWkB-xgBiKgY5R5W4ZCjtnz5EJizG+46dm1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C7FDF8B6-B335-46C3-8A25-F95ACECF4B79 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhS2bg=Rjuq6oEeOacV7PfUENy_jq7dxag=vWsUbdH6pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5681E059 DOT 9070202 AT ecosensory DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5681E059.9070202@ecosensory.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 07:22:33PM -0600, John Griessen wrote:
> On 12/28/2015 06:46 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >I thought PCB was lead by DJ?
> 
> PCB is needing a champion, and I don't see how that will be helped by splitting it off.

All our projects need champions. I don't believe those could be
people who don't work on the code or on the documentation/ideas some
way. I could name those people driving us forward for some of our
projects: I see the man who continues to pull all gEDA with all
its contradictions is DJ, the man who continues to work fine on PCB is
Bert. Unfortunately, geda-gaf has lost such a leader (I mean Peter
B.) due to unfriendly acts of some our collaborators. I very
appreciate Edward's work though I feel we see geda-gaf future
differently. I, for one, wish to unify geda core functions and
rewrite them in Scheme in order to get rid of our C-Scheme-C
structure, throw out duplicated functionality, simplify internal
structure, and make functions less opaque for both C and Scheme
levels. (BTW, gschem has REPL now, are you aware of it? ;))

As DJ has said (related to another issue), we cannot win in the
state we have now. We need leaders for every our projects. And if
he/she decides we must go the way I don't want to, I'll better
leave rather than annoy people and stay on our user's way (am I
wrong here?).

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -