X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=8nBIWAq9XPVqCE5Hk9jIcs6h9KaClAXB+7LgalY/IWY=;
	b=gBfEuG6VxvL1Um5EXn05oml/qi0eDmGWVnzFGkA/7Qumu4epCIiI6KuIpzlrsybvM+
	ZPg0kmTDpFB2xPqI7qHHigS0tknUwGrYZ+Y1fzxBGuw2rd1Sop4zfpv2yPaCFrAzEQAW
	S6bljfpPtOdbTMXPArlIwXiTCC3+cZsGSQSrSXUO82mytjd88lzSgvUUmMBgN2XB+bJ+
	LePV8Lqlp6MIVwgETb8iyTc8aLdCiTdyyNF0eFWe+Cb++1gMGGTPE8QgbVVQg452xxWI
	a/6fa+pZ/vCzRz4UV56DgRlQPymIFfKtUCRxKxS91OYLkjTKVDjQH2TSnTFnEVnGysCs
	c+IA==
X-Received:	by 10.28.172.2 with SMTP id v2mr65703873wme.10.1451393998989;
	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 04:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 13:59:54 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] (generic, buses)
Message-Id:	<20151229135954.3c1b8b97cf421320a6e5ee7a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAGde_xN=BKihkKAkSWAOEuA5EYb9F8Sa_BBWwWdQc1fOrwkB2w@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAGde_xPX8FB57SR-siOf5Udien1H04VVLd4fEFmJJDn30U4MvQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<60951D11-68FB-4184-910F-A201B7C2D079 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20151229092523 DOT e1209f12e48386ec92457dee AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGde_xN=BKihkKAkSWAOEuA5EYb9F8Sa_BBWwWdQc1fOrwkB2w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> My use of gschem is not at gate level, it is at block level, and here
> the need for quick and reliable connection of wide buses is key for
> efficient use.

Buses certainly are useful. They work almost like a cable with several signals.

If looking at a symbol there are named pins and for a bus pin these signals are connected to one pin. For efficient use then connecting a signal to a bus pin there must be a method to select which signal on the bus pin it should be connected to and connections with other names should not be allowed.

> In my view it is only generic if all backends do exactly the same text
> processing and use exactly the same attribute names. I don't think
> that is generic enough. But I may be wrong.
> 
> -- 
> Svenn

It is generic because almost anything which could be represented as symbols connected by lines could be drawn.


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -