X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=5OEijnzb06NV9Fkok4I3gI7zin26yfhSZc9JAfsChCI=;
	b=atMGinJocQVfV1ZTwxTG1Bn654pK8eQ4EbUJENKlL6ETYnaouNhGdlUG2/OgjZYJ6U
	Qc5vmeWM2B9dhSxRjC8hqKXLIBrfXGz/Tsf7Tyi9XQO7khfkMBTLC1aIxa27mqWgtBbM
	wGY56LK52LsqnUnc88XBrNOAfhSxnuuIL+uA5zNFISFU0ttdvPbg+gtUl2FDZScujlz8
	YPD8RES0N5iZBsaZw6sSK2NdvkLz7BagAoVR2V249GVVnLTPN7CYzw1uMTumNE0X40Wh
	KF8PwrsaM9kuS/V4sforh5jmyLjXOkOOgRwdjXpp9Hv7I2yNeh//sw62WJ2PlpvyRiHl
	sS8w==
X-Received:	by 10.194.110.35 with SMTP id hx3mr74196857wjb.0.1451377528881;
	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:25:23 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (generic, buses)
Message-Id:	<20151229092523.e1209f12e48386ec92457dee@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<60951D11-68FB-4184-910F-A201B7C2D079@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAGde_xPX8FB57SR-siOf5Udien1H04VVLd4fEFmJJDn30U4MvQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<60951D11-68FB-4184-910F-A201B7C2D079 AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > On 28 December 2015 at 20:48, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> >> There are really two projects here: The original gEDA (now confusingly
> >> called geda-gaf), and pcb. I think everyone agrees that pcb needs a lot of
> >> work. On the other hand, geda-gaf is matiure, effective, and easy to extend
> >> with scripting. Pcb development requires a great deal of collaboration.
> >> Geda-gaf development mostly does not, as anybody can write and publish a
> >> script.
> > 
> > I would not call a generic schematic capture tool mature until it
> > provides the designer use of buses and bus pins in his design without
> > the need to actually name the nets to have connection.
> 
> I believe Paul Tan does this in his Verilog flow.
> 
> > 
> > --
> > Svenn
> > 
> 
> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com

Then it is certainly very generic: ASIC, Circuit boards, cables connecting circuit boards, Verilog, VHDL?

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -