X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=r+wXaUdBkxXtr6TH/GqlgKboNMo3z1VRlYspQzRxGIU=;
	b=cJ0ke128chu/a0MgFlZLiNdU4cfuyCA+oqmRGhdb/Qw68KJOJbj7rVuhm2numW2acI
	uYY29yvJdEAgTdpZzFduQ1stwT0RZZrrsy+xwFAGWuOUsV7vj2/ao2DeKgriHrNH4n8S
	FF07bcYe8FjMpus0xDJB3cJn9lxYb1ekDlKclNHY1wsUeWIjbYsG+tyWTxyJR702Nr7e
	6pRrPpvWXJljAIE1USofbCaiEYBnERROPSXhxYnstK877OF1DeQxGQVAoQONtbzdAgxA
	vQjUfj18vGIHADV0X/i33x3W0nsnPx8fneSMMMyMENNK3TnbXmvWtQz5K/QYWBDtKB5t
	0/WQ==
X-Received:	by 10.194.133.100 with SMTP id pb4mr60352467wjb.133.1451172125490;
	Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sun, 27 Dec 2015 00:22:00 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Message-Id:	<20151227002200.89a5918f762237055c71c519@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q-N=dNaK=3pV8t14pxDNFROqW4u4MjAc8EEWODmOYVYbA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAJXU7q-STU6GSxZSoes5DozwVVZunXCzWt8QVhU8iAXWwSt=dA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<001a1134f920c49e910527d3a068 AT google DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q-N=dNaK=3pV8t14pxDNFROqW4u4MjAc8EEWODmOYVYbA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Focus on within-layer clearances for now.
> 
> Any more complex design rules (such as dielectric breakdown through
> the layer stack) requires more data than we have in PCB's data-model,
> and may actually belong in a separate calculation utility that would
> calculate out a geometric design rule that can be applied in PCB.
> 
> 
> Peter

Well not that much. If net happen to be on other layer distance must be known but the calculation itself will not be harder.

If file format should be changed it would be good to know if this kind of clearance distance is useful even to it is no plan implement it for the moment.

- Raw text -