X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=)
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A fileformat library
References:	<1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG>
	<CAJXU7q_mXmipJ1fLvLpuLvnYjktV2SHoA+bG=L5+E-EfdygeOA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<s6n37uumanm DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<CAJXU7q_qxdvJaejF-VcY=u7VHZ-zrfrc+Z7-qSwfFyPdy-umxw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<B02363CD-469D-493A-AC15-1D5DC7836982 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20151222232230 DOT 12633 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<0F6F1D0F-4F07-48EA-90FE-836EAD4E2354 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTficnys3a4xs=UBFvk8aPwpzYWUADFLP_pUQ+R1iKs0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512230552520 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<FC796A30-DF21-42E0-89D4-48F3C202BCAE AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512230648180 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<A6BF931F-181E-4B69-8B3E-E1BD202DE7C5 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:11:36 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<A6BF931F-181E-4B69-8B3E-E1BD202DE7C5@noqsi.com> (John Doty's
	message of "Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:26:57 -0700")
Message-ID:	<s6n7fk51453.fsf@blaulicht.dmz.brux>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBNHBot2031685
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> writes:

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 10:50 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, John Doty wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 10:16 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It's painful, and I am fully aware of risking a rewrite if the
>>>> file format changes. I am also fully aware of the fact that
>>>> libgeda exists and it is invented exactly for this kind of stuff.
>>> 
>>> Going through libgeda doesn?t insulate you from change, since the libgeda API is no more stable than the file format.
>> 
>> 
>> That's clear. By "is invented exactly for this kind of stuff" I
>> didn't mean "invented to avoid (API) changes" but "invented to avoid
>> the need to write parsers by hand" - in the sense that one can use
>> it instead of writing a parser.
>
> But is it *really* so hard to write a parser for the .sch format?
> Seems pretty trivial to me. Easier than figuring out what an extra
> layer is actually doing and wrapping it in yet another layer to
> support what *I* need. That’s why I like simple, transparent file
> formats.

What I value most in both the gschem and pcb file formats is that they
are easily AWK parsable, so that simple ad-hoc commandline scripts can
cover deficiencies of the tools.

For example, rigid-flex boards with more than two outer layers are
handled with a little awk postprocessing of the pcb file before Gerber
export.  The awk code is embedded in the Makefile.

If, say, xml format is employed in the future, it will nice if the
tools write the xml in a restricted way such that awk can still be used
to read and manipulate the files.  This is true for the current pcb
format as well.  This kind of ad-hoc scripting relies on the
whitespace/newline placement that the tools write.

I have used gnumeric spreadsheets to generate pcb file fragments
for complicated circular board outlines, hole and connector placements.
Emacs is regularly used to edit layout and schematics files, especially
footprints.

-- 
Stephan

- Raw text -