X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=6gHMctL4rpTFyL6s9DltRQ1VNithdC8Kfz0po+8TJaE=;
	b=jsrjpJzlEO5+nZrx5ZcYm+oQmFGP8iGLGjsVQGtCJDvmBJVdFIWu7vqA6B5sFNC+AJ
	qTbeVgKYRnlFV30YRI0WdWdFCXaJm0sBgl8DwxDJdV7vFXyyA59996BXZhXrOwgt/+ra
	JiZJoyuuQuxHjsAQW45mPh3wduHRvOOwOUfr8mUQx+DLSu8QXpO16TkxePPEwPSZECoa
	NQNOyi7Ba73C/q90wDTaJ6M5pVADP7fo6jVdyxL+ARn6wMK9e5h2AC4H8hkqLeO5uk26
	ZzVJbgth1x9AuRVd2FPqSCaLT6mkk74sI5C1mAOrSAONNjHiFxh5b5Jw/6ZbaOtIcxrw
	I+tQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.116.97 with SMTP id jv1mr32419163wjb.38.1450864698038;
	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 01:58:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<14F365D1-6794-427D-893B-BD972E81771E@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<2F985E82-4EA8-42C9-9C50-99816BCE0BB4 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<CAMvDHVD7FBFuoMwhk3CXjKOOypDBXfmU9wvDTvQt8nvwoK2vZA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<14F365D1-6794-427D-893B-BD972E81771E AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:58:17 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAMvDHVCW5zcu=fo4dU=v-6MVrYXnDgx5nVRrYLToyDOLE_wVdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Missing PO Files
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBN9wND1008717
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 12/22/15, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
...
> Also, since there are multiple translation directories that need to be
> maintained, would it be an improvement to move the PO folder to the root and
> make one translation domain for the entire project? For example, all
> programs and libraries in gEDA would just used the “geda” textdomain,
> instead of separate ones, “geda-gschem,” “geda-gaf,” “geda-gattrib,” etc…

I don't think so. In the state we have now, all programs have
different options, menus, handles and so on. Why should we create
such a mess with their translations in libgeda? As one of the
translators, I'd prefer to have translation things as they are
set up now. This allows me to translate first more important
programs (gschem, gaf), then other utils, and thus makes my life
easier :)

OTOH, we have similar texts in various programs in geda-gaf
because of using similar functions. IMO, we could move such common
things (I mean functions) into libgeda, thus making our world
simpler :)

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -