X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20151222223100.8660.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:31:00 +0100
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
Mail-Followup-To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <CAJXU7q990v-KKB--=839DvsRHDg-QeaCb2bREziv0BoiNMH6rw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151222215211 DOT 5490 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAJXU7q-A4FpmWwTSwpLbiD3FO7D7=FpHtJ6O=a9fyH6B+uXOKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q-A4FpmWwTSwpLbiD3FO7D7=FpHtJ6O=a9fyH6B+uXOKA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I remember a little abrasiveness from the 2007 days, but she's
> being pleasant enough at the moment.
> 
> Concept still looks sound.

Yes I agree completely on both points and I look forward to great
contributions! :)

Verilog for netlists was quite a popular topic at last FOSDEM, there
is a strong tendency going on here!


//Peter

- Raw text -