X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=)
To:	<geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
References:	<1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG>
	<CAJXU7q_mXmipJ1fLvLpuLvnYjktV2SHoA+bG=L5+E-EfdygeOA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:33:01 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q_mXmipJ1fLvLpuLvnYjktV2SHoA+bG=L5+E-EfdygeOA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Peter Clifton's message of "Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:09:03 +0000")
Message-ID:	<s6n37uumanm.fsf@blaulicht.dmz.brux>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBMLXGKA014440
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes:

> I really believe you are on to a very strong concept here...
> schematics have their place IMO, but look at many modern designs
> (laptop etc., say?) and see how that graphical the format of
> schematics is really being pushed beyond its most effective.

People tell me that a schematic drawing should illustrate the function
of a circuit.  But most of that function is hidden inside the µC and
FPGA.  So, my symbols and schematics are more a preview of the layout,
to get a good first shot at (functionally arbitrary) pin assignements.

Like this one:  http://www.ieap.uni-kiel.de/et/people/stephan/rpirena/

I thought about using Verilog as netlist format for PCBs.  How would I
convert those to pcb netlists, with some graphical drawings added in the
mix?

 gschem, gnetlist --> Verilog
 Verilog --> ueda --> PCB netlist

?

-- 
Stephan

- Raw text -