X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=p1fVgjiAlyhHp5cNPOY/Gi49H2UEjZIb0XN2FL2l8WY=;
	b=yQWsAS7m17scjHcacrxj0iQYOBNco7SoJpLynJWJ5qJRJmV/1ZgC0PBTpVVYM/wwek
	xrD4RFMyqoLEJr69g9WmOb3kNPEHmwImxtQ9xm1RACPqS7WWChITaBGo4gOXX+LoKm04
	3whhUv9Jmwxi2fWl0amhn0nDnAg6Wgq7m2KIXTmrtUv7dXaCxeforbwKZ6bBY9flQdtH
	elcOriy/5AkyGqq5DXfx2gU4jUV/Z2VOvyZvgsBcrt5BcOA6G/wZZrvJ7I6QKDMonS1J
	OxvA+Jh/IClmbwymfjjBhYlw54k8FYKj/GSrBvF0q/cOMjAES98M9k/6q7kr8gBjUMb5
	HRuQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.202.85.146 with SMTP id j140mr6948872oib.4.1450817361444;
	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:49:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<20151222193859.26898.qmail@stuge.se>
References:	<5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_GnuGNMtUWkB-xgBiKgY5R5W4ZCjtnz5EJizG+46dm1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C7FDF8B6-B335-46C3-8A25-F95ACECF4B79 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:49:21 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAJXU7q_D7azR2ofhNwO4QggCf=bV6H0kZun6g5BExQQPLZyu_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
From:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 22 December 2015 at 19:38, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>> someone (perhaps one or more of the currently active developers) needs
>> to decide they want to decide and direct the future of gEDA and PCB.
>> Decide this, ask the community for their backing - and if you get it -
>> take the lead. Come to FOSDEM, and speak on behalf of the project,
>> decide its future.
>
> I would cautiously nominate myself. Cautious because:
>
> https://events.ccc.de/congress/2015/Fahrplan/events/7547.html

Sounds interesting... and I'd say, sounds like it qualifies as "experience".


> I do have a vision for open source EDA, I am very good at design
> across many (software) layers and constructing as well as
> implementing complex data models, but I am also starved for time.


The leader doesn't necessarily need to be someone doing the most
coding - or even the most design work, they just need the backing of
enough of the community, and have the personality to cope with
mediating / setting the project direction.


> My first priority for a major change would be to move PCB to a
> generic geometry data model.

Sounds sensible... I would be up for contributing to that.


>> If you do want to lead - but don't get backing to do so - quit...
>> fork... life is short, and if you have a vision for making open-source
>> EDA software better, go achieve that.
>
> Indeed. The empty shell of ideas that is edacore is all that I have
> been able to accomplish while not dealing with gEDA politics at all.


I should go over some of the preliminary stuff Peter B and I started
talking over on netlists / structures, before a) getting busy, and b)
realising that we can't design it before we get good buy-in.


Peter

- Raw text -