X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=AEMtylUe3902nhtQiYKXhj0VQoJTKyfsdZhG9N2HJUo=;
	b=AGkDtITW81yDOJcsq5YWQaXeMCyfjerAyFs/T2X5MgbC9mWhFpBnwW5kWExA+E+nk9
	Ym2kpmGvqUaG3O2IGBvDBrKpb9i8Kcyj0Ej2EJ7WC+DyClbdMxHH8W6MyPDcX3E1qPF5
	1MWgyarqtsxWWVt9g0qOXZXDyG2sQw/gKJygNdT+c7ms0/bGhuEsSTEe8ji/CSRxz5VL
	fvqIH2s6Il6HQJBjWaMlcyrHCoXw2RfQSCtst89lqli6WLbZrhAj5q8fGeu4NV2XhnLY
	jPnaVtLxFnvsSV5Tc91MN0PNqtIfk/GJuX5hpfFVAD+VY3ZUYsGg5BeM/dQaxruZBUBn
	ysfA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.202.213.215 with SMTP id m206mr11743700oig.26.1450814418199;
	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:00:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<CAGde_xM_=aJZ5fds=dq6Z6OnNjYV0MZqiiUmMaxT8GBqYm-TDg@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAGde_xM_=aJZ5fds=dq6Z6OnNjYV0MZqiiUmMaxT8GBqYm-TDg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:00:18 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAJXU7q-Z=4NwUSqNU5bVOyE0fetx-p2Cd08MR_SRq2dopkO7Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] All this talk about STEP made me hope for integration
	with docdokuplm
From:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hmm...

Quick 30 second scan of the website doesn't reveal if it is a STEP
data-model based PLM or not.

If it is - perhaps there is a quite interesting starting point.

If not (and it maintains separate PLM data, with STEP files only used
to tack on / save 3D models), then - yes - in a way, but without any
real benefits over, say, storing binary blobs from a proprietary CAD
system in the PLM.


STEP is very PLM friendly (it was designed to store all this
information), and has huge amounts of scope for introducing product
lifecycle, change control, configuration management etc.. information.

I would also strongly suspect that the docdokuplm people have focused
on the mechanical side of things, probably with AP203 / AP214 support.
I'm unsure what work it would be to add the AP210 protocol as well.

AP210 shares many aspects with the mechanical application domains, but
I suspect it would require a bit of integration on the PLM side of
things to teach it any variations in entities used, and nuances of the
electrical domain product structure.


Peter


On 22 December 2015 at 18:48, Svenn Are Bjerkem
(svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Hi,
> would a step-friendly data model in geda make it suitable for use in
> an open-source plm system like docdokuplm.com?
>
> --
> Svenn

- Raw text -