X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Pr6tepL2dU81LKxd3M2bDxzF8on22QVDWaOjZ7lXEaI=;
	b=qzFBR0BviUlOad7/d1G4mQkk/x7OLBJE6S15uuXqOplWOHuG+h8NibqdTr2JdX+eNG
	xSrTmblOuJbL8V6IcfOOAV3HUT/NzJGgWaWpJasO+eGcIO1b2fKbN/ijfTX5H0SqF6zY
	UBPZIhx7RbtcFRMuY8utaI3V9EJIkzqOn+eQ+iR6LTGfDtJjVUM9N9YP3eCpeCK35LeO
	OwWU6dCa35+ozkGIA+CTyFqTI4JAqt39OLa5iM5eOSfdudfBtU20BV5HoIwbuLWUCJpO
	tcLjzYSVa6f0xFSvDLxkY3r5rHUTFBkSH7lOOQ5+U1R3/Rq4BvSKwqStDjSwNbNnmwbJ
	2ScA==
X-Received:	by 10.28.141.17 with SMTP id p17mr28465832wmd.35.1450813358696;
	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:42:33 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Proposing a New Hierarchical Data Structure?
Message-Id:	<20151222204233.0ccc392762ac3ee53ed6bad0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q826wCc69qaQ71Y=Yqrnxg-044GD4ZSViCYSmf1SMiNNw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151221030451 DOT 02399163eb3e40f21c622c41 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1PTdeCZdT+SthHwQtaxC4x06MbBQmxRcK3DZyQ-jfw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151221203331 DOT 20837 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAJXU7q_XOJStJXhD547xW-+XROkBhctmMAWB-jm0cez5UvgZ7w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1ri4UMeYr01Af-AH005DkLboKO72nGao+ByGmqA51W-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222002012 DOT a88d7fe32a9336855eccd1d0 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9dU=z5KZmgsh+Vau4zZNfEh4Awr5xdzL=6xhimLYVNLw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220421160 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<201512220412 DOT tBM4CJxb018546 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220528100 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAJXU7q89cBkSZZfaS5p2CSDeJRTGCzNs+bNBjL8_KYQ=o7gi=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222153828 DOT 28d3996c10f3182c5efc780a AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q826wCc69qaQ71Y=Yqrnxg-044GD4ZSViCYSmf1SMiNNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> gEDA, nor any other open-source EDA package I know (at this point in
> the tool-chain), is the basis of any academic research. The kind of
> problems we are _still_ arguing about, and trying to solve have long
> ceased to be novel areas for research.

You are right about gschem and almost certainly pcb I do not think anybody is interested in using it for research. In pcb their are routing algorithms or other similar mathematical problems.

What we arguing about is usually not real problems or any problems at all, usually it is the best method to implement something.


Only real problems I could find is copper overlap and clearance. What pcb really lack is different clearance between different nets. Implementing stuff like selection of clearance and trace width from net attributes or similar should be straight forward although their may be a lot of arguing about best method to implement.

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -