www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=Gh8hKbSVasg/wedzLjdRY+HVfCgq4DjGMG8GZXlNZ+k=; | |
b=vz4pUxuNIw3j5l4ZxUEXgVl9SpkH9BsOMj1mYRv+wNAOT7WMMDUQdikNRirMzJrOYm | |
PlBmo7aSyfLwHEDVEX+UaXdPgDAp986uzoGBztsBwonNO60zuAR7KYsnaQOfzqTEZLtq | |
2/x/qwB5OVXhG68ClD2Hh3xRX233QjJscnvJk7C+POwjj4+qbTZqLZdFww4aiAr6i8OA | |
2P2Jslomz5nhIrGhOgyM6CurDSFMQfPvJGIohunsONoI3vtdrbUUUIFAcRJkWzB3Vhlf | |
81Jx+EPBBYmeuOWKf2ouaHmd7spjMw9u9kcr3qfXCzTioHDrDSJyC5aP7EhdfvwzVM4u | |
DxNg== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.28.125.147 with SMTP id y141mr27342409wmc.18.1450812965499; |
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:36:05 -0800 (PST) | |
In-Reply-To: | <CAJXU7q89cBkSZZfaS5p2CSDeJRTGCzNs+bNBjL8_KYQ=o7gi=Q@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<20151221030451 DOT 02399163eb3e40f21c622c41 AT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAOP4iL1PTdeCZdT+SthHwQtaxC4x06MbBQmxRcK3DZyQ-jfw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151221203331 DOT 20837 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
<CAJXU7q_XOJStJXhD547xW-+XROkBhctmMAWB-jm0cez5UvgZ7w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAOP4iL1ri4UMeYr01Af-AH005DkLboKO72nGao+ByGmqA51W-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151222002012 DOT a88d7fe32a9336855eccd1d0 AT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAJXU7q9dU=z5KZmgsh+Vau4zZNfEh4Awr5xdzL=6xhimLYVNLw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220421160 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> | |
<201512220412 DOT tBM4CJxb018546 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220528100 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> | |
<CAJXU7q89cBkSZZfaS5p2CSDeJRTGCzNs+bNBjL8_KYQ=o7gi=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:36:05 -0900 |
Message-ID: | <CAC4O8c9NWpEb9fhxj1ohdSTCFnDsm=x+fZMVyV4VRxQ_whS6xg@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Proposing a New Hierarchical Data Structure? |
From: | "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--001a1141997471b949052781b765 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Peter Clifton ( petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] < geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > On 22 December 2015 at 04:39, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote: > > > Nope. As far as I understood, we are considering the very first step of a > > roadmap. The first step is about how to pick a file format or data > > structure. Peter proposed a specific standard and listed a lot of pros. > > > > My point is only this: not having the standard freely available is a con > > that we should not ignore. > > This is true.. and I've pointed one of the key players in the AP210 > standard at this discussion thread, to see if any impact might be made > on the situation. > > Personally, I doubt we can change the situation... the ISO is big and > ugly, and we are _tiny_. > What I don't quite get is why, once they're already down to a price that is as you point out really pretty damn cheap for what it is and probably nowhere near covering real costs, they can't make the jump to free. I suspect its a situation like with AutoCAD where there are noisy voices out there who don't really want it that available. --001a1141997471b949052781b765 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te">On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Peter Clifton (<a href=3D"mailto:peter= cjclifton AT googlemail DOT com">petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com</a>) [via <a href= =3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"l= tr"><<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-use= r AT delorie DOT com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st= yle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span= class=3D"">On 22 December 2015 at 04:39,=C2=A0 <<a href=3D"mailto:gedau= @igor2.repo.hu">gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu</a>> wrote:<br> <br> > Nope. As far as I understood, we are considering the very first step o= f a<br> > roadmap. The first step is about how to pick a file format or data<br> > structure. Peter proposed a specific standard and listed a lot of pros= .<br> ><br> > My point is only this: not having the standard freely available is a c= on<br> > that we should not ignore.<br> <br> </span>This is true.. and I've pointed one of the key players in the AP= 210<br> standard at this discussion thread, to see if any impact might be made<br> on the situation.<br> <br> Personally, I doubt we can change the situation... the ISO is big and<br> ugly, and we are _tiny_.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style=3D"">Wha= t I don't quite get is why, once they're already down to a price th= at is as you point out really pretty damn cheap for what it is and probably= nowhere near covering real costs, they can't make the jump to free.=C2= =A0 I suspect its a situation like with AutoCAD where there are noisy voice= s out there who don't really want it that available.</div><div style=3D= ""><br></div></div></div></div> --001a1141997471b949052781b765--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |