www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=BpzFSA/XjrvXj7PLtuObCK5XP9nXQHjufM/jDlEVGl4=; | |
b=r0cOJttOXiy3MXmTLumE8NUQnbBuHyIdnUjMXpOBvpUiJMUkQwIm9ayxJL9lfTwMDs | |
sTgYtsJLKJC2KqwoH9qGeO3ttTfdojWmqSg1QQrA4nUxMqzf3pZJqe2pZkMEz0s8qdkE | |
xcEbJORa1Ir5s8tGboQvLJU+CMyYGMXeqQdrbR5uYSaLJghw4syURBAEMIkcAJ2KB/S/ | |
SP8pTnzs2TRElRv+2/yrNYCfG2jtQsWB1Wk+u5snJ/7exrR6+MLrEMsoKpHYRnOWAd8R | |
XHKv6GI11CptWdVBX2hy8UQE3KEcl+Vur3KXzMZYsnTaNyDj2A2jAHGISnIaoEycosT3 | |
X5mA== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.194.173.233 with SMTP id bn9mr29190185wjc.1.1450812663377; |
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:31:03 -0800 (PST) | |
In-Reply-To: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1512220528100.9035@igor2priv> |
References: | <CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<20151221030451 DOT 02399163eb3e40f21c622c41 AT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAOP4iL1PTdeCZdT+SthHwQtaxC4x06MbBQmxRcK3DZyQ-jfw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151221203331 DOT 20837 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
<CAJXU7q_XOJStJXhD547xW-+XROkBhctmMAWB-jm0cez5UvgZ7w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAOP4iL1ri4UMeYr01Af-AH005DkLboKO72nGao+ByGmqA51W-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151222002012 DOT a88d7fe32a9336855eccd1d0 AT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAJXU7q9dU=z5KZmgsh+Vau4zZNfEh4Awr5xdzL=6xhimLYVNLw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220421160 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> | |
<201512220412 DOT tBM4CJxb018546 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220528100 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:31:03 -0900 |
Message-ID: | <CAC4O8c_cy_r3Qp9fnf8ef5eKW92S1KXAuKD0rexvVuSk2Cvv_g@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Proposing a New Hierarchical Data Structure? |
From: | "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--089e0122f0886fba89052781a538 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:39 PM, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, DJ Delorie wrote: > > >> Despite of all the huge amount of work the have invested, unless they make >>> the work really publicly available, I'd prefer not building on it. >>> >> >> I.e. you want someone to either steal the work for you, or do a great >> deal of work on your behalf without any compensation? >> > > Nope. As far as I understood, we are considering the very first step of a > roadmap. The first step is about how to pick a file format or data > structure. Peter proposed a specific standard and listed a lot of pros. > > My point is only this: not having the standard freely available is a con > that we should not ignore. Seconded. STEP its a huge pain in the behind because no free software supports it. I had to have a copy of solid works on windows for nothing but export to STEP, so I could have parts designed with openSCAD actually manufactured. That was a while ago and now 3D printing has forced manufacturers to support STL. With that happening I doubt very much that FOSS support for STEP has improved much. In any case *something* is definitely stopping STEP adoption in FOSS and it's a good bet its the relative unavailability of the standard. --089e0122f0886fba89052781a538 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te">On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:39 PM, <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mail= to:gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" target=3D"_blank">gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu</a>></span= > wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo= rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br> <br> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, DJ Delorie wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Despite of all the huge amount of work the have invested, unless they make<= br> the work really publicly available, I'd prefer not building on it.<br> </blockquote> <br> I.e. you want someone to either steal the work for you, or do a great<br> deal of work on your behalf without any compensation?<br> </blockquote> <br></span> Nope. As far as I understood, we are considering the very first step of a r= oadmap. The first step is about how to pick a file format or data structure= . Peter proposed a specific standard and listed a lot of pros.<br> <br> My point is only this: not having the standard freely available is a con th= at we should not ignore.</blockquote><div><br></div><div style=3D"">Seconde= d.=C2=A0 STEP its a huge pain in the behind because no free software suppor= ts it.=C2=A0 I had to have a copy of solid works on windows for nothing but= export to STEP, so I could have parts designed with openSCAD actually manu= factured.=C2=A0 That was a while ago and now 3D printing has forced manufac= turers to support STL.=C2=A0 With that happening I doubt very much that FOS= S support for STEP has improved much.=C2=A0 In any case *something* is defi= nitely stopping STEP adoption in FOSS and it's a good bet its the relat= ive unavailability of the standard.</div><div><br></div></div></div></div> --089e0122f0886fba89052781a538--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |