X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=C7vbIUHbpR3pjCIDjVDDdc4tKdCgg5pgkyrXgQS6kOM=;
	b=tP08uZ6QMdsHWwZD42LVagRQ10XH/+hTCOmmgwNLBbarT3rou8Wpn4gzfM6jXjHi7C
	U3OR2W+Ud8NHs6P39HAoSLFDA43q4cw2Vam750QKEvvrGIeqvsRJCBwTaFBaW9vyszk7
	kBsm0uEBvGqS6u+yKsa1ziCqNTyRnvMoQLrxO8AktMb8F2tnGnqS7nghOql7aqC2QLZn
	hMZlD6/hhS2I+H2fHvpYLMUCqAJ+mv0zKX3Taq6SIMtxafIU/crfe3HsKvtm/Amb7Fk+
	xIakWBDYhg86hOrAYqVSErjGKWUJfuMY0cwjAbSUaR4i7qPtcLLOmhYHxxJpOguaHJir
	7cdw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.202.85.146 with SMTP id j140mr6311046oib.4.1450804412743;
	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 09:13:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:13:32 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAJXU7q_GnuGNMtUWkB-xgBiKgY5R5W4ZCjtnz5EJizG+46dm1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
From:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBMHDZ1Y013532
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 22 December 2015 at 17:01, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

>> KiCAD has had a clear project at most points in its history, and that
>> person has been responsible for shaping the development goals,
>> strategies and targeting what developer effort they had at their
>> disposal. Handover between leaders has (at least in recent times),
>> been clear and decisive within the project. (I'm less clear about the
>> hand-over from its original author to the first project leader).
>
> And the result is an inflexible integrated tool rather than a flexible toolkit. We cover the parts of the space that they don’t. It would be great to interoperate with KiCAD. It would be horrible to become more like them: they already have that part of the space covered better than we ever will.


I have no idea how you got to your conclusion from that...

They have a goal, and a design target - their leadership furthers the
goal of achieving that design... I fail to see how the fact they have
leadership dictates one design choice over another.

We all _GET_ that you don't like the KiCAD design.
Do you _GET_ that we're (I) am not trying to force that on gEDA?



Peter

- Raw text -