X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=eyQbpYBcUnmf9g7WWJhZU6Yu4goWAm+1aQjAtJFDGrA=;
	b=ytoeeYjPBZIkyxeNu+QJGNLn9yhpKkf+E//l0EtZqmj9MsKxivlqrlVaZTnWrHMVOm
	hvTgSfxn09qTjzDeGa2TPNXVcWIvrFj0avro12tdXm0BGhfNdAc1K+DbltPguXsaktbi
	LCV+ud0av1I0enDc5uvHJhX3b/Lcsp9EKpmtmoKKYFuVdoj2Jc/IXtJgMtbtvZMD3Ch3
	c0HlUUbSyvhrffDgM/IdoDIeTBzZkbhn/bbnrrObvV2Av14gWqjrHlX+TVJsPbaX9Knf
	j7Y9/S7+o/PaOW8YPpn6J18j3IeE1SALMco/Uml9Kx3f9zs/e/KU0yMHrW7SkKx46yxo
	+7Tg==
X-Received:	by 10.28.146.18 with SMTP id u18mr22300829wmd.72.1450738069524;
	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:47:49 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:47:44 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Proposing a New Hierarchical Data Structure?
Message-Id:	<20151221234744.458a2113f928cc0e85cf998b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q_XOJStJXhD547xW-+XROkBhctmMAWB-jm0cez5UvgZ7w@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151221030451 DOT 02399163eb3e40f21c622c41 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1PTdeCZdT+SthHwQtaxC4x06MbBQmxRcK3DZyQ-jfw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151221203331 DOT 20837 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAJXU7q_XOJStJXhD547xW-+XROkBhctmMAWB-jm0cez5UvgZ7w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:21:41 +0000
"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Unless anyone can present decent augments as to why its approach is
> fundamentally different,  or flawed, I think it would be silly to ignore
> (whilst trying to replicate) the _MANY_ man years of design effort captured
> in STEP AP210 and related standards.
> 
> Ultimately, the complexity and size of that data model is because it aims
> to capture an entire design life cycle, taking into account all the nuances
> and aspects of an incredibly wide scope and representing it in a way that
> has a defined semantic interpretation. This is useful, reusable,
> transferable data which in many ways stands alone from the tools
> manipulating it.

I still believe the concept to start thin with a simple sketch and add more information over time is a good approach. If this is possible with AP210 I do not know.

- Raw text -