X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=IgZCdZgzwEeLFjTUryTEIFWZm9pLRTKdsllayZJRM5U=;
	b=vM0yXvQPik8mk9WG5Tid17aPywcTbB+3KyYEHBEjzlpR9dvqR1XDVqDPaslJ9P5BG8
	KBpqvqUbWIx/LHbD/sqDRFrE5cJ8gEoL0IdC/6nL0Nld0QI5zMeOuxwXN1CauCtLCsrC
	61QnPr71bx3I53l+pHVSZs/DcwFaHcLHQNAqCZRGlFbW2zzJdDI6Z+ZJY/Ue06bnAyTF
	ZQ4FaREht3V6xSHty4xRoiOP1CHtJjk0nFfoUe4xzKcV4oCBGVuUypvXMPOYuVSBUGvt
	uKLuloc7WrLb7MhLcnUuffwwir0YJs6M7vkdR/pxcJwpMhvKr7aJUNYNSkeBAbZzkCQx
	KQmA==
X-Received:	by 10.194.110.35 with SMTP id hx3mr19919339wjb.0.1450650261274;
	Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:24:15 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] XML file format (what could be expected)
Message-Id:	<20151220232415.28b2dd1e2e1f2d927943b7ff@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<5677251C.3050009@prochac.sk>
References:	<20151220122659 DOT 378AF809D791 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<20151220120219 DOT c4644eef1a65b0eb2fb60d76 AT gmail DOT com>
	<20151220125839 DOT 10228 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAC4O8c96b4bGencxy9NfMtUAoCxWWJ2CU7f4dVA6GqN+tpRWcw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151220213715 DOT 12bed4bbb43ff067008156a6 AT gmail DOT com>
	<5677251C DOT 3050009 AT prochac DOT sk>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
> >> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> I do not think file format is important.
> >>> You are absolutely right about this, the data model is the challenge,
> >>> not how to store it, that's trivial.
> >>>
> >> But if you're going to go with a plain text format, you'd want a good
> >> reason to choose XML, as its the least readable option.
> > It would be very readable if good graphical viewers where avaialable for Linux but I searched for linux viewers and did not find in debian. If no good parsers are available I guess there is no good reason at all.
> 
> With good graphical viewer also compressed encrypted binary format is 
> very readable.
> 
> For readable plaintext format you need nothing more than text editor 
> with functionality of Notepad.

Yes XML look horrible, I would have preferred structures like "C" or something similar, only reason i brought it up is because it seems to be rather common.

- Raw text -