X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20151210011215.14229.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:12:15 +0100
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gsch2pcb after refdes-renum? (If implemented
	syncronization detail)
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20151208205451 DOT bb2478f8722e1a885822689d AT gmail DOT com> <201512082019 DOT tB8KJOlP030874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151208222204 DOT 6566ebed300ca2683dd71bc8 AT gmail DOT com> <201512082139 DOT tB8LdLuL005789 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151208230637 DOT b8eb6c22230d5a3b977c3ca1 AT gmail DOT com> <201512082229 DOT tB8MTJBj010408 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512090417270 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <555EDA31-984C-4978-AE21-F74907CDC993 AT noqsi DOT com> <20151209220625 DOT ba29467498daecf1bf7b2244 AT gmail DOT com> <201512092109 DOT tB9L9p8o022465 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201512092109.tB9L9p8o022465@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:
> Forward annotation of every other attribute works just fine.  It's
> changing the refdes that's a problem, because gaf treats the refdes
> specially.

Is there still a problem if the cyclic U1->U2->U3->U1 rename is
guaranteed to be atomic?

As in, it's not three rename operations, but a single rename
operation with three affected elements?


//Peter

- Raw text -