X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=uWYXv9YCMv97EpvUOKYE/OOJH5JohV3nkOP1bII0V1I=;
	b=uCw7Y+QUe+POkYivKq4ZsVUDOycx5l/xE0kkM5mo+WtxTURKQ2+Zj8iOfx7sDZ5EeS
	xExHXnQ0LFu5nRlrj5Mz2jGfuoq6REXy3mBfe9vv62m+Q333WRZekxWVvs1UITK+4uqV
	tn4JfqcQ9yaqYu090AkkGmvl4xrfAEgss3XJxqlgirXR5G1nlx+VTDJGSKSE4dDVDW9y
	ZwUlGcIj5QUeTwdzQIkLtMqPnHa9T1KwlySuNeP2WX+DNcfuvDsE8SOiOV1ue7BdUzuj
	Vb1k6a+G7enCsfeSoViUrumuJhuQBSdgU6/90VFpbKMwSbqe0lSDkCiT7neF4vu3g4Kf
	ne0w==
X-Received:	by 10.194.52.3 with SMTP id p3mr35826463wjo.2.1449474043928;
	Sun, 06 Dec 2015 23:40:43 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 08:40:38 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gshem, pcb, arrow movement
Message-Id:	<20151207084038.7a0bc2ff9d40d31b658cc61e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<5664e254.ea95420a.ff728.6ae7@mx.google.com>
References:	<20151206214133 DOT fc8779343f62baa3835fb2e3 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-s2jsBM-so9MpLdjCWkV-678kVabHFTWXZvDPCkM4hzQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5664e254 DOT ea95420a DOT ff728 DOT 6ae7 AT mx DOT google DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On 2015-12-07 02:12:07 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (
> > nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <
> > geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Arrow keys may be used for movement and in gschem "background" is moved
> > > while in pcb pointer is moved. It would be good if both used same keys.
> > > movement of "background" in gschem with arrows is useful but arrow to
> > move
> > > pointer for fine tuning in pcb is quite a lot more useful.
> > >
> > > Then I use them earlier today I thought it might be worth a try to
> > combine
> > > them so that background is moved and pointer is moved relative to
> > > background although it stay at same point on screen.
> > >
> > 
> > The two should ship with the same mouse and key movement system.  There's
> > no reason to have them work differently by default, and it takes a long
> > time to get used to switching between them.  The existing behavior must
> > still be available as an option of course.
> > 
> > I also think pcb system is a bit better than gschem, but there's also the
> > question of which is more typical of other similar interfaces.  I don't
> > know what the default behavior should be exactly, but it should be
> > consistent.
> > 
> 
> The thing that gets me every time, is that you can only drag selected lines in
> pcb, and only UNselected lines in gschem (or is it the other way around?).

In this case pcb is a little bit odd and only allow moving unselected objects, unless several objects are selected? gschem have a nice future to cycle thru different selection possibilities which would be very useful in pcb since objects very often overlap.

I have been using it for weeks quite many hours a day and have written down a few small things then I found. To work efficienlty these small things may be more important than a lot of futures. I ordered three circuit boards last day and now hopefully I will have a little bit of time for improvements.


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -