X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=80L1BGsj8nLX2z2yMFbcQsEVG64Anps03/2Sa4UGyKI=;
	b=lQ8sUc8n/yuvOMYkWA56Bll71rfQxYG/bFszLu7CrH2wzyEPqQCCjWM4RsyftUU8yt
	6yzeE56e2cFAJpGxMoCoG5Y3UlHdMi6hX8PeoFa/f/n3y3wVRWJb2OBFLDUU2PT19v8z
	fBlL1bNoEUU0lDyd7TG+H2t2Uj/4mjsRVkc9//h5TzOjseFLrdtQJ4YJ9IOeEKk3lA2p
	ndalX4c6ZULP4zHmtueMZqQSVhag76SvB4KGalCSMg/kJSW6XenhVIu0aFGO7MWZaTKs
	873W8Df7/96eZJYR8WncWLq13rYvNSQVeG/20lGgTTiQISxyW7EjQPCJwmadLy8TuyRG
	P+1g==
X-Received:	by 10.28.220.69 with SMTP id t66mr17667239wmg.4.1449452512726;
	Sun, 06 Dec 2015 17:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:41:47 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gshem, pcb, arrow movement
Message-Id:	<20151207024147.e789a9fab31fe0d1feb44340@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c-s2jsBM-so9MpLdjCWkV-678kVabHFTWXZvDPCkM4hzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<20151206214133 DOT fc8779343f62baa3835fb2e3 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-s2jsBM-so9MpLdjCWkV-678kVabHFTWXZvDPCkM4hzQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > Arrow keys may be used for movement and in gschem "background" is moved
> > while in pcb pointer is moved. It would be good if both used same keys.
> > movement of "background" in gschem with arrows is useful but arrow to move
> > pointer for fine tuning in pcb is quite a lot more useful.
> >
> > Then I use them earlier today I thought it might be worth a try to combine
> > them so that background is moved and pointer is moved relative to
> > background although it stay at same point on screen.
> >
> 
> The two should ship with the same mouse and key movement system.  There's
> no reason to have them work differently by default, and it takes a long
> time to get used to switching between them.  The existing behavior must
> still be available as an option of course.
> 
> I also think pcb system is a bit better than gschem, but there's also the
> question of which is more typical of other similar interfaces.  I don't
> know what the default behavior should be exactly, but it should be
> consistent.
> 
> Britton

They are very similar. In gschem symbol could not be moved by arrows. In pcb display does not move.

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -