www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/10/07/22:14:04

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject: [geda-user] Re: Politics & Launchpad
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 04:13:38 +0200
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <mv4jgj$jfv$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAM2RGhQUcpV-gKFPpDFrdjWCSXAziQ+DQkWxX6Y4ihi8m2T3aQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-58-73.net-htp.de
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Evan Foss  wrote:

> I am trying to bump this to it's own thread.

Ok, I will bite and give my point of view on the launchpad drama.

Prehistory:
(Markus, please correct me if I present some aspects incorrectly.)
Markus got approached by Eugene Mikhantiev whether his build might 
become the "official" PPA of the geda project. He is doing these 
builds independently since about 2013:
    https://launchpad.net/~mehanik/+archive/ubuntu/geda-unstable
To all of you who are as ignorant as me until very recently -- a PPA 
is Ubuntu talk for a self contained repository for a specific software 
package. It represents a way to get an application in parallel to the 
core packages and the ones available via the connection to Debian. 

You have to be an administrator or owner of a launchpad team to 
associate a PPA. In case of the gEDA_Developers team the only 
adminstrator and owner is the launchpad team "gEDA_Administrators". 
So Markus applied to join this team too. 
Apparently, Markus's application to join got declined. (I hope, I did 
not get this wrong. Again, please correct me if so)
This left him salty. He felt like administrators blocked developers, 
old boys blocked new kids on the block. In an emotional move he 
stopped his efforts to review the backlog of bugs in the bugtrackers 
on launchpad and left the launchpad team gEDA_developers.

In addition, he revitalized a long standing idea to have a single 
place to deal with bugs in all of geda's projects. A team which is as 
open as possible to everybody with good intentions. And of course a 
place to present a PPA of the most current version of the geda tools.
He asked me about an opinion. I responded, I like the approach and 
suggested a name for the effort. You guessed it, this is the team 
"gEDAhead" and its associated project "geda-project" to handle bug 
reports.
	gEDAhead:     https://launchpad.net/~geda 
	gEDA-project: https://launchpad.net/geda-project
Note, that these bugs are exactly the same as those seen in the bug 
trackers for the individual tools. Bugs can be associated with more 
than one project in launchpad.
Markus set up a weekly snapshot PPA in gEDAhead, too. 

In summery, gEDAhead currently provides three benefits:
1) a single place to add and access bug reports of all geda tools
2) a low entrance barrier team to join and become involved
3) a weekly build of the geda tools to be used on ubuntu systems and 
by extension on any debian related distro.

I feel like these are steps in the right direction. Let's use the 
momentum to gedAhead ;-)

---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019