X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=IcKkMIxNoZhMwpaeuk6DkEYK+u+cfxybIfq01Pg8Vvc=;
	b=ZVfKINDnUzb1xk49zly3sAXyiELnliNxM7JRD7m/PQVn5dC2dt0f+UAAcwgFw3ccAq
	XKDr/2sB3HWeeimjkKUJFkddX4ZEVN8VMGNMmZl949xEApjELtaWB7N7H+vWcapmqmFh
	yOSXt18HvDnkXAQqyOJPiBfIRKQic+3VXXeo1n80I1otUlxqChfKcL5CuzGrzo3l4hS4
	E5BGBNadfHomSfwomwO0V7+QXNlNmg0Eoep2f9r2A/X+25EeNESyQGhW/gk0+d04w/mL
	eGoo2mlqCzgGeDfXXqcsr8CaouTX0utCMlJLftneF2V0FVfF8bbG/2fJRrgEzMhHLs7S
	meMQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.180.188.101 with SMTP id fz5mr21000041wic.3.1444159158973;
	Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1510061841060.7137@igor2priv>
References:	<20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAC4O8c_g7e562Gaotrbi6gLfjP6cJU1ys=MtEkDE7bSh4F9dfg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9Bi5HJfcW6wUgm_+4O2gs4vDdBMbS2hF_0dCqnBuJahQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAC4O8c-bnGky=Nab59-pOTJkB8Q9Tc5t5hqE+dnEF-777hUjMg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<muv4ua$hat$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060356440 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060433080 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<56133CC4 DOT 7000306 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060523170 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<5613EBB6 DOT 6060609 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510061841060 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:19:18 +0500
Message-ID:	<CABuVarJ0iMQsMGQQ6Xfdkd8X6pMmWXF9QFY2+rQWgmmtNhDFfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?)
From:	"Sergey Stepanov (no DOT such DOT process AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 10/05/2015 10:34 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
> Again, speaking as an user: it did improve a lot of things for me. After this summer I do have more than 5 features that I was
> missing for years. Now they are there and I use them.


I'm a bit lost in this discussion, could you please point out, where I
can get these improvements?

2015-10-06 21:46 GMT+05:00  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu>:
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, John Griessen wrote:
>
>> On 10/05/2015 10:34 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>>>
>>> Again, speaking as an user: it did improve a lot of things for me. After
>>> this summer I do have more than 5 features that I was
>>> missing for years. Now they are there and I use them.
>>
>>
>> Hi Igor2,
>>
>> What is it that made you say it is unlikely your pcb-rnd code will get
>> back into the main pcb?
>
>
> For majority of the features: I think nobody will spend the time to do the
> merge.
>
> A few features potentially won't get merged because they are not aligned
> with the goals of the mainline.
>
>>
>> Do you think your fork uses some changes to the code that are a total stop
>> to the rest of us?
>
>
> So far, I don't think so. The file format is almost 100% compatible and I
> have good documentation on the few extra features that mainline pcb doesn't
> understand in a .pcb save.
>
> For some users the lack of opengl support in pcb-rnd is a showstopper, tho.
>
>> I don't see pcb in its present state as much to hang onto before a
>> rewrite. It might turn out that
>> having pcb in a working state is good as a test vehicle for proving that a
>> rewrite like SS's Peted
>> is doing all the myriad details needed to still complete a pc board.  And
>> then once the testing is
>> proved, stop adding to pcb and add to peted instead.  All the backward
>> compatibility needed can be
>> handled by translators if the old PCB still works for old designs.
>
>
> I thought peted was a gschem alternative, doing schematics, not PCBs, but I
> might be wrong.
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor2

- Raw text -