X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=CYYvtlRdXtiF/syitc6MC9xBH1qaFkwXM0faN9sEYNA=;
	b=m195dD5Bj6vN7GWns2iVpWfTA9ryUGQ7anOE/yDm1uhf7XW+V3DaUVKyGTzSBqLMud
	cF21VdQR3+OR/VIxxwDmxQHEO1U1PhjaF/BlHEFoM4j4eqof+YZsaRjxJg5lVaEhyjj4
	gLiea25FTPQjC4XIlbqlGsv+qsjNCxPk3puzeI/eZi+9owZB0+qibpBdzGj61PxlVdHk
	qqJEYWVDAuS6Lwa6AqlNb6hNl3k9LuO1LUKFAvAWEQ+8azfkIimOfTAIKJdUU0/0kCD6
	10wp6NPrZKRep1PYAv9iEwyDqml6GyYUkv07/250HAv+PNYWiuC+vtA8s2rv0SEdaZ9J
	IF3Q==
X-Received:	by 10.180.86.100 with SMTP id o4mr10947872wiz.59.1444051820209;
	Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:30:14 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Clutterless user interface or even more custom
	special super features?
Message-Id:	<20151005153014.1af231ef2d4eee97a0dd0054@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJZxidAqEJv+0eSMbnOH39y-ThoXDZitv1w56Gmj0Q4y0paNAA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<56100AF8 DOT 4090802 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<muq108$s12$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20151005072529 DOT GA26068 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<CAJZxidAqEJv+0eSMbnOH39y-ThoXDZitv1w56Gmj0Q4y0paNAA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I'm a lurker on this list, so I realize that my opinions and suggestions
> are probably not important to anyone. Feel free to ignore them. However, I
> think that perhaps the features you are discussing here are specific
> subsets of a more general feature that many users might find useful.
> 
> The feature I'm referring to is what you might call a general selection
> filter. The idea is that with a filter applied, only objects matching the
> filter criteria can be selected and therefore modified (at least with the
> mouse, I imagine that you could still modify anything from the command
> interface). With a tool like this, you could specify "silk screen objects"
> and "text objects". This would restrict you to being able to modify silk
> screen text. You could also specify "not text", or "tracks", or
> "components"... etc. to restrict selections to those items.
> 
> This is not a feature request on my part, nor is it a request for any
> action. I have no idea how hard it would be to implement, or if it's even
> possible given how things are structured. It's just an idea that you might
> want to consider if you're thinking about changing the features previously
> mentioned.

There are "regular expressions" but I tried it but did not like it, something else in common use?

- Raw text -