X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=LLk3y8QwMXZm8tr2aSvcKMOXvSuYOtmrg1GhRIOgrAw=;
	b=Uewhw5V8AjYEnmwn2Eyj/L1HxInY4jQ4YJCuCJeWWXGpNHB8vPqH/XhhGodIiRHxqd
	C2ay7gzgZq4vlArGbFquZQ+aYP3CnYM7MAzq33VkBD6MZwBYdsvrnQvgbvTJ/Orp3StP
	XxC7WmpuUmQGKnuVw9FmGyKh27uBbfyW0mXymHFwGgWxmOKbrHlzzhemeYhE5c8YB26O
	XlbljLXyDZYlvV2WAQxnz2T1pIt885npFuRF7kz5HCnJr3nnDGavk6+C0WgvXyoVpvdq
	4kzjrosOYMn9/Ba8d8vzN5VvBIq7pFGCf/pL76e1//RFEzxr7Z9tOusDPLjd/CDGM9s2
	4xEw==
X-Received:	by 10.112.13.161 with SMTP id i1mr8413133lbc.96.1443911370685;
	Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 01:29:28 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
Message-ID:	<20151003222928.GC4287@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<56104E16.3050006@jump-ing.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 11:52:22PM +0200, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> My personal opinion is to bump it only if it's neccessary for some
> substantial advantage. I wouldn't bump the version for the purpose of
> bumping it.

The one advantage I see is moving the project forward.

In order to bump the version we have to throw out obsolete functions and
replace them with new ones, which as a whole will ease transition to
gtk3 in future.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -