www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=Ka/dI2/eekfqISwAiEPw5gaqhSMSCvs98Rg/GxnyPTw=; | |
b=xXo5Ad8NJfiAV19B6Gt83lJYH/lOMYJQxdF0WyjJfs1zAyaBGkBxLHBtPa0Cv+PixB | |
8fTEAc/NzROIMMEqdzfS23mVx568UTsr1KMGWwgQM8bnc9oJ4w8YsPRgS79Xzp/yWpaB | |
5nmMacYX28eqXLWLSaNQAKWKsMxbdPM4shTLhB2OZI/m6FkfMtkLzDehka01y5vBbV3j | |
/zUTM3/tdvRwTaZ7V3nXUj5475ZfVCnIyMVCEBs1hP2WfUolFtyP08ItJmXxrzivcxM8 | |
qqWDystaddopGh6Q15mngeTqlzRCv0oyFDaeF/coCF7ao+78F31Hw/iZd/cn1VBmkNnP | |
cMiQ== | |
X-Received: | by 10.180.10.101 with SMTP id h5mr12257941wib.27.1443121169922; |
Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:59:29 -0700 (PDT) | |
Date: | Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:59:25 +0200 |
From: | "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Off topic (UV printer) |
Message-Id: | <20150924205925.7ec3b7aaf3fbde3ed5f24a9f@gmail.com> |
In-Reply-To: | <CANEvwqjtGTAB2tRvN2P3BKANr5fMG7LWtk_+1wSCNVKqOAFz1w@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <20150924171517 DOT d86815c2ed405313f5767140 AT gmail DOT com> |
<56042E2C DOT 2020904 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
<CAC4O8c-+imBBCvkVqj5_9TorGdeJXPHRd0LVGtgbaSqT+2A27w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<CANEvwqjtGTAB2tRvN2P3BKANr5fMG7LWtk_+1wSCNVKqOAFz1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
X-Mailer: | Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Good UV print quality requires a lens with a very short focal length. 1.5" > or less - Preferably less. If your going to > chemically process the board after exposure, you can get great resolution > with a solid state device somewhere in > the range of 1064 nanometers with a short focal length lense. In fact, > repeatable, high resolution detail is easily > achievable on a budget. > > If your not on a budget, a 30 to 50 watt fiber laser with a short focal > length lense can provide unparalleled resolution > without any post production work other than drilling (If you have the 50 > watt device you can also drill really clean holes). Thanks! Cheap laser printers are available everywhere so if I could print directly on the board then there would be one step less. I only make simple boards myself, the others are not worth the effort.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |