www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Envelope-From: | paubert AT iram DOT es |
Date: | Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:02:36 +0200 |
From: | "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon |
Message-ID: | <20150923180236.GA7581@visitor2.iram.es> |
References: | <CAM2RGhTbgUfGJZacRUQ=3VBAKtd0F7OV37oRZFVjHR4A9XecnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<20150917043146 DOT GA1837 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509171124330 DOT 3828 AT nimbus> | |
<20150917142035 DOT GA5896 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509221658000 DOT 1461 AT newt> | |
<56018A8B DOT 6010000 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509222341230 DOT 1639 AT newt> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509222341230.1639@newt> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
X-Spamina-Bogosity: | Unsure |
X-Spamina-Spam-Score: | -0.2 (/) |
X-Spamina-Spam-Report: | Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) |
pts rule name description | |
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | |
-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | |
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% | |
[score: 0.4770] | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:19:23AM +0200, Roland Lutz wrote: > > That's more the idea of Xorn. Things which were difficult before > and are now realistically possible include > - proper scripting (this was one major incentive for me to start Xorn) > - solving the red dot problem Any pointers to what you call the "red dot problem"? > - allowing nets inside symbols (e.g. for schematic templates) > - disabling selected netlister stages (e.g. for cascade) > - passing more structured information to netlister backends (e.g. > for allowing subschematics to be routed as independent sublayouts) > - accessing all available schematic information from netlister > backends (e.g. for passing certain net attributes on to PCB) > > >Seen in this light, Xorn is only 50% finished so far. > > Much less than 50%. If you see the above list, this should be obvious. ;) > > The only feature Xorn drops is executing Scheme code, which is a > direct consequence of it not embedding Guile. This hasn't been an > easy decision, but the lack of proper Python bindings for Guile and > the fact that Scheme scripting would be kind of redundant tipped the > scale. Gabriel
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |