X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=+X1MOm/Y7cQ+iGZTmGo6Dn47AjQxgrAVNK9b+sNnWXs=;
	b=IwhsMLgQLsHew9+l5GZwTX71jFbY7efTdzVsF/hFaC8sxrYGGJ6uIgsd56V5nf7kih
	JebKy2Xb1UC3tkaYkseQPfh8YvaxcmQebEw+d7kSDYv20vvFFCUMnZuS8URBzNULe8/a
	vpMZUD5ez15NDZ/02cdEVuNFKhJAzK1yhuPBCytQ4ukBzXb5bQ4YyhxtQ30RS/nYbDSj
	7cFoHjTppdS8k8GFW9ViTeSQCQ0wQv6ZqCdPVNuK7jk6q69Cq+i9w0u2lMxwagT+54Jd
	LdtT6wHywxdXpiTDMrZ8nvLgyZhdqBNtKy5m21VVXuNY5XLHXWg7AEMRNlUZLcrqP1rk
	YDdA==
X-Received:	by 10.180.221.193 with SMTP id qg1mr21170810wic.87.1442955781760;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:02:56 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Apollon the technical thread
Message-Id:	<20150922230256.b4ffebd36673249c01156648@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<1442944287.677.34.camel@ssalewski.de>
References:	<20150921001659 DOT 0c211170 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55FF3F4B DOT 8000406 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CACwWb3DhZCvy7sffoG5GW-=-EYAC5Ym8KOQ2HJnGe6kov+pXRQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD7zFq=ypb5gWWvqv_FemiJucm_cDfAPfeeTmGiu-zKNyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150921225908 DOT 480bde74 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<201509220522 DOT t8M5M6WF010656 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150922065143 DOT GA25726 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<CACwWb3C-CD0EQdj-Tnqg3M7bZVnJVMrLGXzQMnBxr-aP0L5FGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD7fbqCLDR89r4xt+LqMD-mCM1+8weZmmtk+7T5Xmosz0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1442935680 DOT 677 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509221815040 DOT 4099 AT newt>
	<1442940597 DOT 677 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150922193026 DOT 0cfe8c907ad7891f7e0bf504 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1442944287 DOT 677 DOT 34 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > > Yes -- I had only silk layer fonts in mind, and there different
> > > appearance is not a big problem. Copper font must be fixed. For
> > > what do
> > > we use copper fonts? I used the words "layer 0", "layer 1" ... only
> > > to
> > > indicate correct orientation for the fab house.
> > 
> > Do you think it is a good idea with a different implementation for
> > fonts on silkscreen and fonts on copper layer?
> 
> I think fonts for screen display should look as beautiful as possible,
> and drawing speed should be as fast as possible. So use native fonts.
> For gerber file -- silk and copper -- we can not use native fonts, but
> have to construct it from lines and arcs. Disadvantage is that screen
> display and gerber display looks not exactly the same. For me that is
> OK, others may not like it. For copper, we may enforce the gerber font
> for screen display to guarantee identical layout. And we may offer
> gerber font for screen display for people who like that better.
> 
> Sorry, fully abstract theoretical opinion only.

Beatiful font for screen display is good and it is important to be able to read text.

I guess design rule check have to work with same drawing primitives as in the gerber file but I might be wrong. If this is the case it would make sense to work with these kind of drawing primitives in memory but it would however be possible to use something else at the same time to get something nice looking on screen. For the moment this is also a theoretical opinion only.

- Raw text -