X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=S0LRHf85NYLcMHgl7Q83grhw95i4Wa5lC8aKGfdAa9s=;
	b=iVlbZnQmXEN3D+d+1SR9C+dRMcZpsPOZeEWJCr37Jl4/xI0vnVUOaFitJEbs492T4D
	P2WbUjf7WxpFTVdj/E73k/hQ7Qpf0tkl3O2hq+WLlaL5eGv5tVnMVaXSqeIjKiVnwCMe
	9Sqduab7ztGiwx8NtHMYh6GZuwEOhHEJcQGFtYmDhJ0xjUyxRKHr4SiHcQ0H3C3Ow+vD
	pcYJh3tNoMqjzFxs1+LZO6xCZbC2lEYeuSQ2hHM3hOKA96lxU1aZLnLqvayDRb5fg/ou
	s2oL7K1dL3+0faXepgGM+7Hw9LEu469l1ipfvJqFAVFUYAmbmfb9YMr6v2k5TW47xmWN
	ljjw==
X-Received:	by 10.194.189.235 with SMTP id gl11mr22313970wjc.68.1442943028348;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 19:30:26 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Apollon the technical thread
Message-Id:	<20150922193026.0cfe8c907ad7891f7e0bf504@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<1442940597.677.26.camel@ssalewski.de>
References:	<20150921001659 DOT 0c211170 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55FF3F4B DOT 8000406 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CACwWb3DhZCvy7sffoG5GW-=-EYAC5Ym8KOQ2HJnGe6kov+pXRQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD7zFq=ypb5gWWvqv_FemiJucm_cDfAPfeeTmGiu-zKNyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150921225908 DOT 480bde74 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<201509220522 DOT t8M5M6WF010656 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150922065143 DOT GA25726 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<CACwWb3C-CD0EQdj-Tnqg3M7bZVnJVMrLGXzQMnBxr-aP0L5FGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD7fbqCLDR89r4xt+LqMD-mCM1+8weZmmtk+7T5Xmosz0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1442935680 DOT 677 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509221815040 DOT 4099 AT newt>
	<1442940597 DOT 677 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Yes -- I had only silk layer fonts in mind, and there different
> appearance is not a big problem. Copper font must be fixed. For what do
> we use copper fonts? I used the words "layer 0", "layer 1" ... only to
> indicate correct orientation for the fab house.

Do you think it is a good idea with a different implementation for fonts on silkscreen and fonts on copper layer?

- Raw text -