X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	1wfV7T4VpI30BIe80ZXZyimBPWkNwpSUb2DwAcBp80I=; b=iBYf6qUsgA5URI/m
	YhmKYGYpPPBAMEBoK/LaVuaJZD5lh32flW8sRXLoZZlu0IIPBxRPtJE/tGlDiZX4
	SivmRuqH1uC2AiHzNU0770u0FPPwbOgS6U30WXYxOHOMRlI7n0Y1b66bjbj9Yjsu
	bOZcUglJ1gPXvUbzXTXw8+ja2ak=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gschem, best size of symbols and text?
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<1442845842 DOT 2167 DOT 27 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
From:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<560028E1.8070802@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:57:21 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1442845842.2167.27.camel@ssalewski.de>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am 21.09.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Stefan Salewski:
> But now I get the feeling that basic symbols (resistor, capacitor, ...)
> are indeed too large compared to the default 100 grid size. [...]
> For screen display, I prefer 10 units for general line width, and
> currently I like 600 units for total resistor length.

As far as I can see, current preferred line width is zero, so it
defaults to one pixel, which is almost unreadable on high resolution
displays. (It took a really long time until people started to recognize
that depending on the size of a pixel on a specific device (screen)
isn't exactly a wise idea)

Regarding text size I'd prefer one which approximately fits into the
european resistor symbol. Which is smaller than the current size. As you
said, all elements are scaleable.

Texts are currently always anchored bottom left, which isn't a good
choice when it should be centered.

So far my $0.02. :-)


Whatever you do, please take care that stuff is unified across the whole
library. For example it bugs me that there are several equivalent
generic connector symbols, so I always have to try and guess to find the
one matching the connectors already in use in the schematics.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -