X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=eImKykq7fvF4cUhVT/xmtZwoG0SPJoRBT9zyh3B8ACw=;
	b=t2rIVykMPYBcZlSLEU1+EwYsxmv0eEzNb46SIcRF436iPYwdOEXDgqeVolM+03Yazy
	v0PGszpaUazwN3rhxnKz2PTWJCozjFXMgjpOBlVgEKLIGv5upj/YcI5aKsZzIOMUdj/y
	uh79bqRoNq6PGg9tqU5AcUs6MC+II5mBBAJHxDlfB5CMZUJSgsQFEJ81tdL8/ZxuKMnl
	WSmbIGDcRTHf4nSu8mJEDOxviuuzoM5ZBF9PErA5jl9DA6QZ8JhWCJ1Jamn2YniMc3KA
	bIAUe3Pa05UOOxSnQ22s/V1Q7EJuoys51stvw/vrk9zYLr0MNf7dgu4rRNTy3ftzQYqM
	CkEQ==
X-Received:	by 10.180.104.68 with SMTP id gc4mr14184871wib.78.1442846616608;
	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:43:31 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features (multiple pins
	one net)
Message-Id:	<20150921164331.99aafffaf6386a55ed792d91@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1509211402220.1633@newt>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen>
	<201509082040 DOT t88KerD6005455 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<EA4D92E5-7674-49D8-911E-1318E2F1CEF1 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509211402220 DOT 1633 AT newt>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > Would this proposed feature also work for connecting a single pin to 
> > multiple pads? For example, could three pin symbols for transistors work 
> > with devices that have four pads? It would be nice to support all the 
> > relationships:
> >
> > - one to one
> > - one to many (3 pin symbol transistor with a 4 pad footprint)
> > - many to one (pass thru pins)
> > - many to many
> >
> > Pass thru pins could make the symbols for parts where the signal passes 
> > straight through easier to work with. For example, TVS diode pairs, feed 
> > thru capacitors, and transistors used in current mirrors.
> 
> The feature isn't about connected pins/pads on a footprint at all; it's 
> about grouping multiple nets (or pins) graphically into a single bus net 
> (or bus pin).
> ...

This is about grouping nets together in a bus it would however be rather useful with one pin in the symbol then there are several physical pins on the package on the real circuit. It is for example very common with several ground pins and in such case it would be possible with a schematic figure with only one ground pin.

- Raw text -