X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=PWZ33XA3Umv6RUua7z+oTT+zbg22YWxuhqbnD+eTIeM=;
	b=hCCTEY+cePEdF/H27KLXQCRQaOzPa3XOHUCsZ3/F7KqWlaYEwr2/hn+63NHML2xPzV
	eNzoJDyaGdpmRxah9r26hpkPm0CdXIBivVVE3LHvTeg2zNYp9dRdg19UZjzFBBIAfPHM
	1ctRiXAlUxUZXBUlR54ThltcGHkOCejUtwVU4NQJjmLBEeNU3Qh86hJOChSnHns7rg87
	W4sEYtWrm+ywcoNr9DE3rbEbO2i1rJIQn7UtWAZ1bzVijbbDU9wrwbSytcxiX1VAffA6
	zc938Djz6nURPth3lpKyV0eXpUFooQO4v5lKtNTAu7Nq2yJi04JqPbcpfv2+QjhgmcVp
	vDQA==
X-Received:	by 10.152.6.162 with SMTP id c2mr29023353laa.26.1442490497856;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:48:15 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Fwd: gaf improvement - moving of components
Message-ID:	<20150917114815.GA20921@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<FXM.JVj9.72U2vXC1esF.1L{0cc AT seznam DOT cz>
	<CAM2RGhQO-9wac22EY5dvjbz91X4MFNNKmNPqDG35FXDwunqcHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<MaL.JVpj.5TbfZn6LyMn.1L{efM AT seznam DOT cz>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<MaL.JVpj.5TbfZn6LyMn.1L{efM@seznam.cz>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:39:34AM +0200, Vaclav Peroutka (vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >
> "> Hello,
> >
> > as in another thread there is discussion about gaf state, I have one idea 
> to
> > gaf improvement regarding movement of already connected components. I do 
> not
> > know how it is hard to implement it in the current gaf. But as first
> > iteration
> > it can be enough if pin is taken as net with length of zero. And then this
> > net is extended in the direction of movement.
> >
> > For example, the bottom left result can be done by moving R1 left, then
> > down,
> > then right. For me this is still simpler than to remove the net, move the
> > component and then add the new net again.
> >
> > Second iteration is check if currently extending net does not overlay
> > another
> > item on the board ( component, net, text etc) and automatic splitting nets
> > in
> > the middle or near other items.
> >
> > What do you think about it ?
> 
> Sorry to say this but I don't think you are supposed to join nets like
> that. I said this back then. Other people cited nondescript technical
> reasons.
> 
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/40275
> 
> "
> 
> 
> 
> You are actually right that people answered. I already forgot it. 
> Nevertheless, the way Cedarlogic behaves is in my opinionĀ  better than 
> implementation in gschem. I do not know anything about internals of neither 
> software. But from user's (my) point of view this is the way how I can 
> increase my productivity. I believe that other users can have other 
> opinions...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Shall I put this feature request to launchpad or not necessarilly ?
Please do it.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -